PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BUT.L vs. ATST.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BUT.LATST.L
YTD Return25.13%14.45%
1Y Return45.08%22.88%
3Y Return (Ann)12.63%7.99%
5Y Return (Ann)14.53%11.21%
10Y Return (Ann)13.28%12.54%
Sharpe Ratio3.141.91
Sortino Ratio4.102.58
Omega Ratio1.541.35
Calmar Ratio6.962.85
Martin Ratio25.917.75
Ulcer Index1.82%2.95%
Daily Std Dev15.07%11.96%
Max Drawdown-64.93%-41.44%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Fundamentals


BUT.LATST.L
Market Cap£627.72M£3.41B
EPS£2.43£2.12
PE Ratio6.015.73
Total Revenue (TTM)£109.49M£652.76M
Gross Profit (TTM)£106.94M£635.13M
EBITDA (TTM)£35.17M£295.69M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between BUT.L and ATST.L is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BUT.L vs. ATST.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BUT.L achieves a 25.13% return, which is significantly higher than ATST.L's 14.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BUT.L has outperformed ATST.L with an annualized return of 13.28%, while ATST.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.62%
4.36%
BUT.L
ATST.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BUT.L vs. ATST.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) and Alliance Trust plc (ATST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BUT.L, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BUT.L, currently valued at 4.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BUT.L, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.56
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BUT.L, currently valued at 4.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BUT.L, currently valued at 25.74, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0025.74
ATST.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 4.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATST.L, currently valued at 13.42, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0013.42

BUT.L vs. ATST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUT.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the ATST.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUT.L and ATST.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.37
2.31
BUT.L
ATST.L

Dividends

BUT.L vs. ATST.L - Dividend Comparison

BUT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than ATST.L's 2.07% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BUT.L
Brunner Investment Trust
1.61%1.89%2.11%1.82%2.32%2.19%2.62%2.12%2.57%1.81%0.03%2.78%
ATST.L
Alliance Trust plc
2.07%2.24%2.51%1.63%1.59%1.65%1.48%1.76%2.02%1.76%0.02%1.66%

Drawdowns

BUT.L vs. ATST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUT.L drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, which is greater than ATST.L's maximum drawdown of -41.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUT.L and ATST.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
BUT.L
ATST.L

Volatility

BUT.L vs. ATST.L - Volatility Comparison

Brunner Investment Trust (BUT.L) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Alliance Trust plc (ATST.L) at 3.23%. This indicates that BUT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.36%
3.23%
BUT.L
ATST.L

Financials

BUT.L vs. ATST.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunner Investment Trust and Alliance Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items