BURBY vs. CDI.PA

In the year-to-date period, BURBY achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly higher than CDI.PA's -24.64% return. Over the past 10 years, BURBY has underperformed CDI.PA with an annualized return of -3.56%, while CDI.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Burberry Group Plc (BURBY) and Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BURBY Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the CDI.PA Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BURBY and CDI.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BURBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than CDI.PA's 2.90% yield.

The maximum BURBY drawdown since its inception was -75.06%, which is greater than CDI.PA's maximum drawdown of -69.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BURBY and CDI.PA.

Burberry Group Plc (BURBY) has a higher volatility of 17.77% compared to Christian Dior SE (CDI.PA) at 9.95%. This indicates that BURBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDI.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Burberry Group Plc and Christian Dior SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.