PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BULZ vs. TSLA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BULZTSLA
YTD Return5.81%-26.24%
1Y Return170.94%13.25%
Sharpe Ratio2.580.23
Daily Std Dev65.18%51.21%
Max Drawdown-94.44%-73.63%
Current Drawdown-67.83%-55.29%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between BULZ and TSLA is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BULZ vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -26.24% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-54.39%
-20.20%
BULZ
TSLA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN

Tesla, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BULZ vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BULZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 13.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0013.11
TSLA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.000.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TSLA, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.000.47

BULZ vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BULZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BULZ and TSLA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
2.58
0.23
BULZ
TSLA

Dividends

BULZ vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BULZ nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BULZ vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and TSLA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-67.83%
-55.29%
BULZ
TSLA

Volatility

BULZ vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) is 21.32%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 24.01%. This indicates that BULZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
21.32%
24.01%
BULZ
TSLA