PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BULZ vs. TSLA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BULZ and TSLA is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

BULZ vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-28.51%
91.64%
BULZ
TSLA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BULZ:

0.96

TSLA:

1.19

Sortino Ratio

BULZ:

1.53

TSLA:

1.97

Omega Ratio

BULZ:

1.20

TSLA:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

BULZ:

0.94

TSLA:

1.14

Martin Ratio

BULZ:

3.39

TSLA:

3.26

Ulcer Index

BULZ:

20.36%

TSLA:

22.88%

Daily Std Dev

BULZ:

72.11%

TSLA:

62.89%

Max Drawdown

BULZ:

-94.44%

TSLA:

-73.63%

Current Drawdown

BULZ:

-49.58%

TSLA:

-8.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 65.84% return, which is significantly lower than TSLA's 77.13% return.


BULZ

YTD

65.84%

1M

9.42%

6M

7.56%

1Y

65.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TSLA

YTD

77.13%

1M

29.93%

6M

138.09%

1Y

71.11%

5Y*

75.02%

10Y*

40.66%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BULZ vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.961.19
The chart of Sortino ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.531.97
The chart of Omega ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.201.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.941.14
The chart of Martin ratio for BULZ, currently valued at 3.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.393.26
BULZ
TSLA

The current BULZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BULZ and TSLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.96
1.19
BULZ
TSLA

Dividends

BULZ vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BULZ nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BULZ vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and TSLA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-49.58%
-8.28%
BULZ
TSLA

Volatility

BULZ vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) at 16.49%. This indicates that BULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
21.32%
16.49%
BULZ
TSLA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab