BULZ vs. FTFT
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT).
BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BULZ or FTFT.
Performance
BULZ vs. FTFT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 53.82% return, which is significantly higher than FTFT's -75.96% return.
BULZ
53.82%
9.66%
22.48%
81.85%
N/A
N/A
FTFT
-75.96%
36.40%
-45.69%
-41.33%
-30.48%
-36.87%
Key characteristics
| BULZ | FTFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.19 | -0.38 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.72 | 0.04 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.00 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.09 | -0.42 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.14 | -0.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 20.09% | 64.87% |
| Daily Std Dev | 70.13% | 109.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -94.44% | -99.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -53.24% | -99.85% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between BULZ and FTFT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BULZ vs. FTFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BULZ vs. FTFT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BULZ nor FTFT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BULZ vs. FTFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, smaller than the maximum FTFT drawdown of -99.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and FTFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BULZ vs. FTFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) is 21.96%, while Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) has a volatility of 45.48%. This indicates that BULZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.