BULZ vs. FTFT
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT).
BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BULZ or FTFT.
Key characteristics
| BULZ | FTFT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.73% | -53.55% |
| 1Y Return | 212.63% | -35.61% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.23 | -0.38 |
| Daily Std Dev | 65.39% | 100.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -94.44% | -100.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -65.73% | -100.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BULZ and FTFT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BULZ vs. FTFT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BULZ achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly higher than FTFT's -53.55% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BULZ vs. FTFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) and Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BULZ vs. FTFT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BULZ nor FTFT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BULZ vs. FTFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BULZ drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, smaller than the maximum FTFT drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BULZ and FTFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BULZ vs. FTFT - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a higher volatility of 22.17% compared to Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) at 16.17%. This indicates that BULZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.