BUL vs. SCHD
BUL (Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUL returned 11.26%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SCHD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
BUL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
BUL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
BUL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 9.02% | 19.18% | 27.39% | 3.68% | -16.18% | 32.48% | 27.26% | 4.81% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUL and SCHD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUL and SCHD has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BUL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUL
SCHD
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BUL
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
BUL
SCHD
Healthcare
BUL
SCHD
Industrials
BUL
SCHD
Basic Materials
BUL
SCHD
Energy
BUL
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
BUL
SCHD
Communication Services
BUL
SCHD
Financial Services
BUL
-
SCHD
Real Estate
BUL
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
BUL
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
BUL
SCHD
BUL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.45 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 5.91 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 14.53 | -4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.49 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.86 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
BUL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -33.37% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -4.61% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -16.13% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.85% | -16.85% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.40% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -3.32% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.88% | +0.58% |
Volatility
BUL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that BUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 2.66% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 7.66% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 10.96% | +5.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 14.38% | +7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 16.72% | +7.53% |
BUL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 0.23% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 2.11% | 0.67% | 0.08% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUL has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUL dropped -37.08% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, BUL leads with 11.26% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUL has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BUL.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.23% for BUL.
BUL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. BUL tracks Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BUL and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUL and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer