BUI vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BUI or UTF.
Correlation
The correlation between BUI and UTF is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BUI vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BUI:
1.06
UTF:
1.22
BUI:
1.49
UTF:
1.63
BUI:
1.20
UTF:
1.24
BUI:
1.22
UTF:
1.65
BUI:
3.92
UTF:
4.75
BUI:
4.26%
UTF:
4.18%
BUI:
15.77%
UTF:
16.22%
BUI:
-46.49%
UTF:
-72.62%
BUI:
-0.27%
UTF:
-0.25%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUI achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 9.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BUI has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 9.24%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.
BUI
4.01%
15.25%
7.40%
14.54%
11.70%
9.24%
UTF
9.52%
13.02%
6.61%
18.86%
12.12%
9.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BUI vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BUI
UTF
BUI vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BUI vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
BUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, less than UTF's 7.25% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUI BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust | 6.42% | 6.26% | 6.65% | 6.99% | 5.45% | 5.80% | 6.51% | 7.35% | 6.72% | 7.89% | 8.65% | 7.00% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.25% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.10% | 7.31% | 10.43% | 8.32% | 6.47% |
Drawdowns
BUI vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUI drawdown since its inception was -46.49%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUI and UTF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BUI vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 4.84%. This indicates that BUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BUI vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities