Correlation
The correlation between BUI and UTF is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
BUI vs. UTF
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BUI or UTF.
Performance
BUI vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
BUI:
0.99
UTF:
1.26
BUI:
1.60
UTF:
2.08
BUI:
1.22
UTF:
1.31
BUI:
1.33
UTF:
2.17
BUI:
4.31
UTF:
6.27
BUI:
4.22%
UTF:
4.16%
BUI:
15.73%
UTF:
15.88%
BUI:
-46.49%
UTF:
-72.65%
BUI:
-0.45%
UTF:
0.00%
Fundamentals
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUI achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BUI has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 9.75%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.
BUI
6.67%
3.07%
5.22%
15.40%
9.51%
8.88%
9.75%
UTF
13.11%
3.85%
5.40%
19.80%
5.94%
10.24%
10.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BUI vs. UTF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BUI
UTF
BUI vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
BUI vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
BUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, less than UTF's 7.06% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUI BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust | 6.36% | 6.26% | 6.65% | 6.99% | 5.45% | 5.80% | 6.51% | 7.35% | 6.72% | 7.89% | 8.65% | 7.00% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 7.06% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% | 6.51% |
Drawdowns
BUI vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUI drawdown since its inception was -46.49%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUI and UTF.
Loading data...
Volatility
BUI vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 3.38%. This indicates that BUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
BUI vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities