BUG vs. VGT
BUG (Global X Cybersecurity ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - BUG tracks the Indxx Cybersecurity Index while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUG returned 6.86%/yr vs 22.23%/yr for VGT. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
BUG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUG achieves a 20.72% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
BUG
- 1D
- -4.04%
- 1M
- 33.08%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 2.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
BUG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 20.72% | -5.04% | 9.59% | 41.40% | -33.63% | 13.24% | 70.83% | 6.55% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 9.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUG and VGT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between BUG and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BUG vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BUG
VGT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
BUG
VGT
Communication Services
BUG
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
BUG
VGT
Consumer Defensive
BUG
VGT
-
Healthcare
BUG
VGT
Basic Materials
BUG
-
VGT
Energy
BUG
-
VGT
Financial Services
BUG
-
VGT
Industrials
BUG
-
VGT
Real Estate
BUG
-
VGT
-
Utilities
BUG
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
BUG
VGT
BUG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUG | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.47 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 3.69 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 11.77 | -11.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUG | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 2.95 | -2.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.89 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.68 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
BUG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUG drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUG and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUG | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -54.63% | +12.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | -16.40% | -21.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -27.23% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.66% | -35.07% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -1.48% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -7.95% | -6.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 5.13% | +13.23% |
Volatility
BUG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that BUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUG | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | 6.39% | +7.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.81% | 16.07% | +9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.78% | 20.57% | +10.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.47% | 25.18% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.33% | 24.60% | +4.73% |
BUG vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
BUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUG Global X Cybersecurity ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 1.56% | 0.66% | 0.46% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUG and VGT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUG has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUG dropped -41.66% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 22.23% vs 6.86% for BUG. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 22.23% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUG.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.03% for BUG.
BUG tracks Indxx Cybersecurity Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BUG and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUG and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer