PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFF vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFF vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.10% return.


BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*

DGRW

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFF vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.42%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-12.08%32.32%-7.04%15.63%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.10%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFF and DGRW is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2016

0.78

The correlation between BUFF and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFF vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUFF
DGRW

Technology

36.2%
32.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
7.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
12.8%

Industrials

8.1%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.7%

Energy

3.5%
5.0%

Utilities

2.3%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.3%

Technology

BUFF
36.2%
DGRW
32.1%

Financial Services

BUFF
11.9%
DGRW
11.3%

Communication Services

BUFF
10.9%
DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BUFF
10.1%
DGRW
7.1%

Healthcare

BUFF
8.4%
DGRW
12.8%

Industrials

BUFF
8.1%
DGRW
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

BUFF
4.9%
DGRW
6.7%

Energy

BUFF
3.5%
DGRW
5.0%

Utilities

BUFF
2.3%
DGRW
0.2%

Real Estate

BUFF
1.9%
DGRW

-

Basic Materials

BUFF
1.8%
DGRW
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFF vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFF vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFFDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.39

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

2.52

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.50

11.03

+10.47

BUFF vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFF Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFF and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFFDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.12

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.88

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.86

-0.36

Drawdowns

BUFF vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFFDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-32.04%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.58%

-8.30%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

-16.21%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

-17.27%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.83%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-3.01%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

1.89%

-1.22%

Volatility

BUFF vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) is 1.02%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that BUFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFFDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

2.47%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

7.64%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

9.88%

-4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.41%

13.97%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

16.21%

+1.46%

BUFF vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFF vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

BUFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%0.00%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.27%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFF and DGRW have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFF dropped -46.23% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 12.17% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 12.17% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for BUFF.

BUFF is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DGRW is Dividend. BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for BUFF and 0.28% for DGRW.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFF and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer