PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFD vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFD achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


BUFD

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.70%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.68%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BUFD
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF
5.08%10.66%12.42%15.40%-7.70%5.97%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%25.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFD and VOO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

0.89

The correlation between BUFD and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

BUFD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BUFD
VOO

Technology

36.2%
35.7%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.6%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.5%

Industrials

8.1%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BUFD
36.2%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

BUFD
11.9%
VOO
11.6%

Communication Services

BUFD
10.9%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BUFD
10.1%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

BUFD
8.4%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

BUFD
8.1%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

BUFD
4.9%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

BUFD
3.5%
VOO
3.5%

Utilities

BUFD
2.3%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

BUFD
1.9%
VOO
1.9%

Basic Materials

BUFD
1.8%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFD
BUFD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFDVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

2.39

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.32

3.25

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.43

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.16

+1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.97

14.73

+8.24

BUFD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFDVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.39

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.83

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.89

+0.11

Drawdowns

BUFD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFD drawdown since its inception was -10.75%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFD and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.75%

-33.99%

+23.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-8.90%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.15%

-18.69%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.75%

-24.52%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.70%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-3.69%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

1.91%

-1.28%

Volatility

BUFD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) is 0.79%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that BUFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

2.84%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.94%

8.90%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.19%

11.80%

-6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.73%

16.81%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

18.01%

-10.46%

BUFD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BUFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFD
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BUFD and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to BUFD (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFD dropped -10.75% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 7.62% for BUFD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BUFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFD.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for BUFD.

BUFD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFD and 0.03% for VOO.

BUFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFD and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer