PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUD vs. SHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BUD vs. SHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUD achieves a 28.09% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's -1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BUD has underperformed SHW with an annualized return of -1.97%, while SHW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.89% annualized return.


BUD

1D
0.11%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
28.09%
6M
29.40%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
-1.97%

SHW

1D
-1.21%
1M
2.53%
YTD
-1.73%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
-4.09%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
13.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUD vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
28.09%30.33%-21.37%9.04%0.09%-12.66%-13.97%27.69%-38.79%9.62%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
-1.73%-3.83%9.90%32.73%-31.96%44.90%27.05%49.70%-3.23%54.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BUD and SHW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2009

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BUD:

$159.86B

SHW:

$78.62B

EPS

BUD:

$6.15

SHW:

$10.42

PE Ratio

BUD:

13.14

SHW:

30.41

PEG Ratio

BUD:

1.16

SHW:

2.96

PS Ratio

BUD:

1.33

SHW:

3.30

PB Ratio

BUD:

1.83

SHW:

17.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

BUD:

$120.38B

SHW:

$23.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BUD:

$67.02B

SHW:

$11.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

BUD:

$35.48B

SHW:

$4.29B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUD vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUD
BUD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SHW
SHW Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUD vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUDSHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.99

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

-0.19

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

-0.39

+1.85

BUD vs. SHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUD Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the SHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUD and SHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUD vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUD drawdown since its inception was -70.02%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUD and SHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUDSHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.02%

-52.02%

-18.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.12%

-21.36%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.55%

-25.69%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.93%

-42.46%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.02%

-42.46%

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.74%

-19.63%

-5.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-11.63%

-11.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.70%

10.42%

+0.28%

Volatility

BUD vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is 6.75%, while The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that BUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUDSHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

8.71%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.03%

19.62%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.55%

25.11%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.89%

26.32%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

26.62%

+1.03%

Dividends

BUD vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison

BUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than SHW's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
1.66%1.91%1.74%1.28%0.88%0.98%0.79%2.45%5.15%3.63%5.41%3.21%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
1.00%0.98%0.84%0.78%1.01%0.62%0.73%0.77%0.87%0.83%1.25%1.03%

Financials

BUD vs. SHW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B202120222023202420252026
30.61B
5.67B
(BUD) Total Revenue
(SHW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BUD vs. SHW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and The Sherwin-Williams Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
55.9%
49.1%
Portfolio components
BUD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 17.10B and revenue of 30.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

SHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

BUD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 80.56M and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

SHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

BUD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 3.01B and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.

SHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BUD and SHW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHW has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to BUD (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUD dropped -70.02% vs SHW's -52.02%.

BUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUD and SHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer