BTZ vs. PHK
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) and PIMCO High Income Fund (PHK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BTZ or PHK.
Key characteristics
BTZ | PHK | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 14.47% | 11.33% |
1Y Return | 23.68% | 26.10% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -1.86% | 3.91% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 3.88% | 2.27% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 5.70% | 2.72% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.57 | 2.69 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.64 | 3.90 |
Omega Ratio | 1.49 | 1.59 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.04 | 1.49 |
Martin Ratio | 10.42 | 19.34 |
Ulcer Index | 2.52% | 1.50% |
Daily Std Dev | 10.20% | 10.80% |
Max Drawdown | -74.66% | -75.29% |
Current Drawdown | -7.62% | -1.45% |
Fundamentals
BTZ | PHK |
---|
Correlation
The correlation between BTZ and PHK is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BTZ vs. PHK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BTZ achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than PHK's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BTZ has outperformed PHK with an annualized return of 5.70%, while PHK has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BTZ vs. PHK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) and PIMCO High Income Fund (PHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BTZ vs. PHK - Dividend Comparison
BTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than PHK's 11.54% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust | 8.45% | 9.77% | 9.15% | 6.70% | 6.85% | 6.24% | 7.19% | 6.28% | 6.92% | 7.88% | 7.52% | 7.32% |
PIMCO High Income Fund | 11.54% | 12.51% | 12.18% | 9.37% | 10.60% | 10.55% | 12.13% | 13.32% | 13.48% | 16.97% | 13.01% | 12.57% |
Drawdowns
BTZ vs. PHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTZ drawdown since its inception was -74.66%, roughly equal to the maximum PHK drawdown of -75.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTZ and PHK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BTZ vs. PHK - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to PIMCO High Income Fund (PHK) at 2.38%. This indicates that BTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BTZ vs. PHK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust and PIMCO High Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities