PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTZ vs. PDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BTZ vs. PDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTZ achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than PDO's -0.79% return.


BTZ

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-1.65%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
9.61%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
5.76%

PDO

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
-0.74%
1Y
8.53%
3Y*
12.58%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTZ vs. PDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTZ
BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust
-2.22%13.70%11.25%12.78%-27.11%7.73%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
-0.79%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BTZ and PDO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.42

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTZ vs. PDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTZ
BTZ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTZ vs. PDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTZPDODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

0.86

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.84

1.24

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

0.83

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.50

3.03

-1.53

BTZ vs. PDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the PDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTZ and PDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTZPDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

0.86

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.17

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.26

-0.07

Drawdowns

BTZ vs. PDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTZ drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than PDO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTZ and PDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTZPDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.62%

-36.83%

-37.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-11.18%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.29%

-16.55%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.67%

-36.83%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.73%

-4.65%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.51%

-14.44%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.06%

-0.30%

Volatility

BTZ vs. PDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) is 3.22%, while Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that BTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTZPDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.78%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

8.93%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.95%

9.94%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

15.85%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.13%

15.57%

-2.44%

Dividends

BTZ vs. PDO - Dividend Comparison

BTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.90%, less than PDO's 11.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTZ
BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust
9.90%9.30%9.63%9.76%9.14%6.69%6.84%6.23%7.19%6.25%6.90%7.83%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.72%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BTZ vs. PDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
57.36M
(BTZ) Total Revenue
(PDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BTZ and PDO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDO has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to BTZ (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTZ dropped -74.62% vs PDO's -36.83%.

PDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTZ and PDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer