PortfoliosLab logo
BTZ vs. BCAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BTZ and BCAT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BTZ vs. BCAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) and BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTZ:

1.12

BCAT:

0.86

Sortino Ratio

BTZ:

1.55

BCAT:

1.08

Omega Ratio

BTZ:

1.24

BCAT:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

BTZ:

0.85

BCAT:

0.79

Martin Ratio

BTZ:

5.49

BCAT:

3.33

Ulcer Index

BTZ:

2.42%

BCAT:

3.24%

Daily Std Dev

BTZ:

11.45%

BCAT:

15.54%

Max Drawdown

BTZ:

-74.64%

BCAT:

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

BTZ:

-4.14%

BCAT:

-0.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTZ:

$1.00B

BCAT:

$1.56B

EPS

BTZ:

$0.69

BCAT:

$1.84

PE Ratio

BTZ:

15.55

BCAT:

8.09

PS Ratio

BTZ:

9.35

BCAT:

7.95

PB Ratio

BTZ:

0.95

BCAT:

0.90

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTZ achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than BCAT's 8.09% return.


BTZ

YTD

6.76%

1M

2.52%

6M

2.49%

1Y

11.27%

3Y*

7.40%

5Y*

4.01%

10Y*

5.83%

BCAT

YTD

8.09%

1M

2.99%

6M

2.22%

1Y

12.19%

3Y*

12.36%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTZ vs. BCAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTZ is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTZ is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTZ is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTZ is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTZ is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTZ is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BCAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCAT is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCAT is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCAT is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCAT is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCAT is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCAT is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTZ vs. BCAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) and BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BTZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the BCAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTZ and BCAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BTZ vs. BCAT - Dividend Comparison

BTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, less than BCAT's 23.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BTZ
BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust
9.38%9.63%9.76%9.14%6.69%6.84%6.23%7.19%6.25%6.90%7.83%7.48%
BCAT
BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust
23.11%17.50%10.11%9.00%6.42%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BTZ vs. BCAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTZ drawdown since its inception was -74.64%, which is greater than BCAT's maximum drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTZ and BCAT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BTZ vs. BCAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) is 2.24%, while BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust (BCAT) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that BTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BTZ vs. BCAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust and BlackRock Capital Allocation Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
55.42M
(BTZ) Total Revenue
(BCAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items