PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTSMX vs. XMHQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BTSMX and XMHQ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

BTSMX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Trust SMID Cap Fund (BTSMX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.94%
-0.40%
BTSMX
XMHQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTSMX:

0.68

XMHQ:

0.31

Sortino Ratio

BTSMX:

1.05

XMHQ:

0.57

Omega Ratio

BTSMX:

1.12

XMHQ:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

BTSMX:

0.86

XMHQ:

0.54

Martin Ratio

BTSMX:

1.97

XMHQ:

1.04

Ulcer Index

BTSMX:

4.60%

XMHQ:

5.34%

Daily Std Dev

BTSMX:

13.40%

XMHQ:

18.05%

Max Drawdown

BTSMX:

-38.04%

XMHQ:

-58.19%

Current Drawdown

BTSMX:

-7.36%

XMHQ:

-9.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTSMX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than XMHQ's 0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BTSMX has outperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 21.02%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.


BTSMX

YTD

1.81%

1M

-1.71%

6M

3.95%

1Y

9.56%

5Y*

7.78%

10Y*

21.02%

XMHQ

YTD

0.56%

1M

-4.73%

6M

-0.40%

1Y

6.55%

5Y*

14.93%

10Y*

11.12%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTSMX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTSMX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.


BTSMX
Boston Trust SMID Cap Fund
Expense ratio chart for BTSMX: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for XMHQ: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTSMX vs. XMHQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTSMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTSMX is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTSMX is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTSMX is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTSMX is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTSMX is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTSMX is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XMHQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMHQ is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMHQ is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTSMX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust SMID Cap Fund (BTSMX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTSMX, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.680.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTSMX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.050.57
The chart of Omega ratio for BTSMX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.121.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTSMX, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.860.54
The chart of Martin ratio for BTSMX, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.971.04
BTSMX
XMHQ

The current BTSMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the XMHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTSMX and XMHQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.68
0.31
BTSMX
XMHQ

Dividends

BTSMX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison

BTSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than XMHQ's 5.17% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BTSMX
Boston Trust SMID Cap Fund
0.83%0.85%0.71%1.01%0.76%0.64%98.22%0.78%0.47%1.13%0.33%0.04%
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
5.17%5.20%0.73%1.72%1.00%1.12%1.22%1.59%1.06%1.64%1.34%1.25%

Drawdowns

BTSMX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTSMX drawdown since its inception was -38.04%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTSMX and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.36%
-9.27%
BTSMX
XMHQ

Volatility

BTSMX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Trust SMID Cap Fund (BTSMX) is 2.88%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that BTSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.88%
4.27%
BTSMX
XMHQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab