PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTI vs. INVH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BTI vs. INVH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTI achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than INVH's 5.15% return.


BTI

1D
-0.89%
1M
2.98%
YTD
8.33%
6M
7.29%
1Y
41.12%
3Y*
33.38%
5Y*
17.85%
10Y*
6.75%

INVH

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.19%
YTD
5.15%
6M
5.90%
1Y
-10.58%
3Y*
-2.32%
5Y*
-1.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTI vs. INVH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
8.33%65.81%35.44%-19.97%14.91%7.95%-4.73%42.97%-49.35%14.13%
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
5.15%-9.68%-3.13%19.71%-33.04%55.58%1.19%52.27%-13.10%19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BTI and INVH is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.25

The correlation between BTI and INVH shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BTI:

$4.93

INVH:

$0.96

PE Ratio

BTI:

12.27

INVH:

30.11

PEG Ratio

BTI:

0.46

INVH:

1.31

PS Ratio

BTI:

2.58

INVH:

6.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTI:

$51.48B

INVH:

$2.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTI:

$42.82B

INVH:

$1.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

BTI:

$20.34B

INVH:

$1.64B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTI vs. INVH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTI
BTI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

INVH
INVH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
INVH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
INVH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTI vs. INVH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTIINVHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

-0.52

+2.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

-0.61

+3.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.93

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

-0.41

+3.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.16

-0.70

+7.85

BTI vs. INVH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the INVH Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTI and INVH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTIINVHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

-0.52

+2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

-0.07

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.26

+0.32

Drawdowns

BTI vs. INVH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTI drawdown since its inception was -64.11%, which is greater than INVH's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTI and INVH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTIINVHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.11%

-50.54%

-13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-26.13%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-30.87%

+17.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-38.44%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.36%

-26.25%

+16.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.94%

-13.34%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

15.33%

-9.50%

Volatility

BTI vs. INVH - Volatility Comparison

British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) at 4.82%. This indicates that BTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTIINVHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

4.82%

+4.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.97%

16.29%

+1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

20.55%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

23.19%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.18%

25.52%

-1.34%

Dividends

BTI vs. INVH - Dividend Comparison

BTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than INVH's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
5.10%5.29%8.18%9.72%7.23%7.98%7.22%6.35%8.53%4.27%3.85%4.11%
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
4.09%4.21%3.53%3.87%2.97%1.50%2.02%1.74%2.19%0.93%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BTI vs. INVH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between British American Tobacco p.l.c. and Invitation Homes Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20212022202320242025
13.54B
685.25M
(BTI) Total Revenue
(INVH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BTI vs. INVH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between British American Tobacco p.l.c. and Invitation Homes Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
83.4%
3.1%
Portfolio components
BTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a gross profit of 11.30B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.

INVH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invitation Homes Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.19M and revenue of 685.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.1%.

BTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported an operating income of 4.93B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

INVH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invitation Homes Inc. reported an operating income of 187.06M and revenue of 685.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.3%.

BTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.

INVH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invitation Homes Inc. reported a net income of 144.55M and revenue of 685.25M, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BTI and INVH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTI has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to INVH (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTI dropped -64.11% vs INVH's -50.54%.

BTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTI and INVH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer