PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTHM vs. FDIF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BTHM and FDIF is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

BTHM vs. FDIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.56%
15.24%
BTHM
FDIF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTHM:

1.77

FDIF:

1.36

Sortino Ratio

BTHM:

2.40

FDIF:

1.90

Omega Ratio

BTHM:

1.32

FDIF:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

BTHM:

2.88

FDIF:

2.01

Martin Ratio

BTHM:

10.96

FDIF:

7.27

Ulcer Index

BTHM:

2.44%

FDIF:

2.99%

Daily Std Dev

BTHM:

15.11%

FDIF:

15.95%

Max Drawdown

BTHM:

-26.54%

FDIF:

-17.33%

Current Drawdown

BTHM:

-0.74%

FDIF:

-0.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTHM achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than FDIF's 6.17% return.


BTHM

YTD

4.73%

1M

0.53%

6M

11.56%

1Y

29.00%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FDIF

YTD

6.17%

1M

1.88%

6M

15.24%

1Y

23.82%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTHM vs. FDIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTHM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIF's 0.50% expense ratio.


BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for FDIF: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTHM vs. FDIF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTHM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTHM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDIF is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDIF is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDIF is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDIF is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDIF is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDIF is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTHM vs. FDIF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.821.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.461.90
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.331.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.962.01
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 11.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.287.27
BTHM
FDIF

The current BTHM Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the FDIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTHM and FDIF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.82
1.36
BTHM
FDIF

Dividends

BTHM vs. FDIF - Dividend Comparison

BTHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than FDIF's 0.33% yield.


TTM202420232022
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.70%0.73%0.55%0.90%
FDIF
Fidelity Disruptors ETF
0.33%0.35%0.21%0.00%

Drawdowns

BTHM vs. FDIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTHM drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, which is greater than FDIF's maximum drawdown of -17.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTHM and FDIF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.74%
-0.89%
BTHM
FDIF

Volatility

BTHM vs. FDIF - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Fidelity Disruptors ETF (FDIF) at 3.81%. This indicates that BTHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.57%
3.81%
BTHM
FDIF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab