PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTHM vs. CGGR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BTHMCGGR
YTD Return34.47%31.08%
1Y Return45.70%47.33%
Sharpe Ratio3.222.98
Sortino Ratio4.283.87
Omega Ratio1.581.54
Calmar Ratio4.964.79
Martin Ratio21.2819.59
Ulcer Index2.16%2.42%
Daily Std Dev14.31%15.90%
Max Drawdown-26.54%-28.90%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between BTHM and CGGR is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BTHM vs. CGGR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BTHM achieves a 34.47% return, which is significantly higher than CGGR's 31.08% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.90%
17.55%
BTHM
CGGR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTHM vs. CGGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTHM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CGGR's 0.39% expense ratio.


BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for CGGR: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTHM vs. CGGR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTHM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 4.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 4.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.96
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 21.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0021.28
CGGR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGGR, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGGR, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGGR, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGGR, currently valued at 4.79, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.79
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGGR, currently valued at 19.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0019.59

BTHM vs. CGGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTHM Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is comparable to the CGGR Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTHM and CGGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.22
2.98
BTHM
CGGR

Dividends

BTHM vs. CGGR - Dividend Comparison

BTHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than CGGR's 0.32% yield.


TTM20232022
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.29%0.55%0.90%
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
0.32%0.40%0.34%

Drawdowns

BTHM vs. CGGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTHM drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum CGGR drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTHM and CGGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
BTHM
CGGR

Volatility

BTHM vs. CGGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) is 4.13%, while Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that BTHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.13%
4.99%
BTHM
CGGR