PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTHM vs. CGGR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BTHM and CGGR is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

BTHM vs. CGGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
11.54%
17.03%
BTHM
CGGR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTHM:

2.44

CGGR:

2.26

Sortino Ratio

BTHM:

3.25

CGGR:

2.94

Omega Ratio

BTHM:

1.44

CGGR:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

BTHM:

3.85

CGGR:

3.76

Martin Ratio

BTHM:

15.91

CGGR:

14.92

Ulcer Index

BTHM:

2.24%

CGGR:

2.49%

Daily Std Dev

BTHM:

14.64%

CGGR:

16.44%

Max Drawdown

BTHM:

-26.54%

CGGR:

-28.90%

Current Drawdown

BTHM:

-2.04%

CGGR:

-1.63%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BTHM having a 35.63% return and CGGR slightly higher at 36.97%.


BTHM

YTD

35.63%

1M

0.84%

6M

11.54%

1Y

35.69%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CGGR

YTD

36.97%

1M

2.99%

6M

17.03%

1Y

37.17%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTHM vs. CGGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTHM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CGGR's 0.39% expense ratio.


BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for CGGR: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTHM vs. CGGR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.442.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.252.94
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.441.41
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.853.76
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 15.91, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.9114.92
BTHM
CGGR

The current BTHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the CGGR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTHM and CGGR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.44
2.26
BTHM
CGGR

Dividends

BTHM vs. CGGR - Dividend Comparison

BTHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than CGGR's 0.30% yield.


TTM20232022
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.70%0.55%0.90%
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
0.30%0.40%0.34%

Drawdowns

BTHM vs. CGGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTHM drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum CGGR drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTHM and CGGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.04%
-1.63%
BTHM
CGGR

Volatility

BTHM vs. CGGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) is 4.24%, while Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that BTHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.24%
5.63%
BTHM
CGGR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab