PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTHM vs. CAML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BTHM and CAML is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

BTHM vs. CAML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
46.86%
39.47%
BTHM
CAML

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTHM:

2.44

CAML:

1.77

Sortino Ratio

BTHM:

3.25

CAML:

2.43

Omega Ratio

BTHM:

1.44

CAML:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

BTHM:

3.85

CAML:

2.77

Martin Ratio

BTHM:

15.91

CAML:

11.41

Ulcer Index

BTHM:

2.24%

CAML:

2.36%

Daily Std Dev

BTHM:

14.64%

CAML:

15.26%

Max Drawdown

BTHM:

-26.54%

CAML:

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

BTHM:

-2.04%

CAML:

-2.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTHM achieves a 35.63% return, which is significantly higher than CAML's 26.83% return.


BTHM

YTD

35.63%

1M

0.84%

6M

11.54%

1Y

35.69%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CAML

YTD

26.83%

1M

-0.01%

6M

9.41%

1Y

26.96%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTHM vs. CAML - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTHM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CAML's 0.65% expense ratio.


CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for CAML: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTHM vs. CAML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.441.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.252.43
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.441.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.852.77
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 15.91, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.9111.41
BTHM
CAML

The current BTHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the CAML Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTHM and CAML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 15Sep 22Sep 29Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22
2.44
1.77
BTHM
CAML

Dividends

BTHM vs. CAML - Dividend Comparison

BTHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than CAML's 0.06% yield.


TTM20232022
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.70%0.55%0.90%
CAML
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
0.06%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BTHM vs. CAML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTHM drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, which is greater than CAML's maximum drawdown of -9.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTHM and CAML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.04%
-2.95%
BTHM
CAML

Volatility

BTHM vs. CAML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) is 4.24%, while Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that BTHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.24%
4.87%
BTHM
CAML
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab