PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTHM vs. BAMG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BTHMBAMG
YTD Return24.39%16.12%
Daily Std Dev14.50%14.01%
Max Drawdown-26.54%-7.63%
Current Drawdown-0.91%-0.26%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between BTHM and BAMG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BTHM vs. BAMG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BTHM achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly higher than BAMG's 16.12% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
9.28%
8.44%
BTHM
BAMG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTHM vs. BAMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTHM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMG's 0.95% expense ratio.


BAMG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
Expense ratio chart for BAMG: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTHM vs. BAMG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTHM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.81
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 13.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0013.54
BAMG
Sharpe ratio
No data

BTHM vs. BAMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

BTHM vs. BAMG - Dividend Comparison

BTHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than BAMG's 0.12% yield.


TTM20232022
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.31%0.55%0.90%
BAMG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
0.12%0.12%0.00%

Drawdowns

BTHM vs. BAMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTHM drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, which is greater than BAMG's maximum drawdown of -7.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTHM and BAMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.91%
-0.26%
BTHM
BAMG

Volatility

BTHM vs. BAMG - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) at 4.23%. This indicates that BTHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.78%
4.23%
BTHM
BAMG