PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTHM vs. AIEQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BTHM and AIEQ is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

BTHM vs. AIEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
11.59%
16.95%
BTHM
AIEQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTHM:

1.90

AIEQ:

1.20

Sortino Ratio

BTHM:

2.56

AIEQ:

1.68

Omega Ratio

BTHM:

1.34

AIEQ:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

BTHM:

3.11

AIEQ:

0.87

Martin Ratio

BTHM:

11.82

AIEQ:

5.17

Ulcer Index

BTHM:

2.44%

AIEQ:

3.89%

Daily Std Dev

BTHM:

15.13%

AIEQ:

16.71%

Max Drawdown

BTHM:

-26.54%

AIEQ:

-38.97%

Current Drawdown

BTHM:

-0.60%

AIEQ:

-1.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTHM achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than AIEQ's 6.79% return.


BTHM

YTD

4.88%

1M

1.96%

6M

11.60%

1Y

27.66%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AIEQ

YTD

6.79%

1M

3.60%

6M

16.95%

1Y

18.90%

5Y*

8.01%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTHM vs. AIEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTHM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AIEQ's 0.80% expense ratio.


AIEQ
AI Powered Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for AIEQ: current value at 0.80% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.80%
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTHM vs. AIEQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTHM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTHM is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTHM is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTHM is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTHM is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AIEQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AIEQ is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AIEQ is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AIEQ is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AIEQ is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AIEQ is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AIEQ is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTHM vs. AIEQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) and AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.811.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.451.68
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.321.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.95, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.951.03
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 11.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.215.17
BTHM
AIEQ

The current BTHM Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the AIEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTHM and AIEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.81
1.20
BTHM
AIEQ

Dividends

BTHM vs. AIEQ - Dividend Comparison

BTHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than AIEQ's 0.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.70%0.73%0.55%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AIEQ
AI Powered Equity ETF
0.61%0.65%0.97%0.11%1.76%0.39%0.60%9.11%0.16%

Drawdowns

BTHM vs. AIEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTHM drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, smaller than the maximum AIEQ drawdown of -38.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTHM and AIEQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.60%
0
BTHM
AIEQ

Volatility

BTHM vs. AIEQ - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) at 4.19%. This indicates that BTHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.80%
4.19%
BTHM
AIEQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab