PortfoliosLab logo
BTG vs. NEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BTG and NEM is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BTG vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in B2Gold Corp. (BTG) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTG:

0.31

NEM:

0.55

Sortino Ratio

BTG:

0.93

NEM:

1.07

Omega Ratio

BTG:

1.11

NEM:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

BTG:

0.33

NEM:

0.48

Martin Ratio

BTG:

1.29

NEM:

1.37

Ulcer Index

BTG:

15.74%

NEM:

18.11%

Daily Std Dev

BTG:

46.47%

NEM:

37.11%

Max Drawdown

BTG:

-85.97%

NEM:

-77.55%

Current Drawdown

BTG:

-46.27%

NEM:

-32.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTG:

$4.03B

NEM:

$58.21B

EPS

BTG:

-$0.47

NEM:

$4.39

PEG Ratio

BTG:

4.71

NEM:

0.79

PS Ratio

BTG:

2.04

NEM:

2.96

PB Ratio

BTG:

1.31

NEM:

1.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTG:

$1.97B

NEM:

$19.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTG:

$941.63M

NEM:

$7.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

BTG:

-$9.05M

NEM:

$9.78B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTG achieves a 32.52% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 41.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BTG has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 8.54%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.38% annualized return.


BTG

YTD

32.52%

1M

-3.31%

6M

17.11%

1Y

14.16%

3Y*

-3.33%

5Y*

-6.22%

10Y*

8.54%

NEM

YTD

41.35%

1M

-5.05%

6M

22.57%

1Y

20.39%

3Y*

-4.79%

5Y*

-0.64%

10Y*

9.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


B2Gold Corp.

Newmont Goldcorp Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTG vs. NEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTG is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTG is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTG is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTG is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTG is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTG is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEM is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEM is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEM is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEM is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEM is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEM is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTG vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B2Gold Corp. (BTG) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTG and NEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BTG vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

BTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than NEM's 1.91% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BTG
B2Gold Corp.
4.36%6.56%5.06%4.48%4.07%1.96%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
1.91%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%1.19%

Drawdowns

BTG vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTG drawdown since its inception was -85.97%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTG and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BTG vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

B2Gold Corp. (BTG) has a higher volatility of 14.03% compared to Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) at 12.11%. This indicates that BTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BTG vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B2Gold Corp. and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
532.11M
5.01B
(BTG) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BTG vs. NEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between B2Gold Corp. and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
44.7%
46.1%
(BTG) Gross Margin
(NEM) Gross Margin
BTG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B2Gold Corp. reported a gross profit of 237.75M and revenue of 532.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

NEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 5.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.1%.

BTG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B2Gold Corp. reported an operating income of 208.83M and revenue of 532.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.3%.

NEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 5.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.2%.

BTG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B2Gold Corp. reported a net income of 57.59M and revenue of 532.11M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

NEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 5.01B, resulting in a net margin of 37.7%.