BTG vs. GFI
Compare and contrast key facts about B2Gold Corp. (BTG) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BTG or GFI.
Key characteristics
| BTG | GFI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -11.26% | -2.85% |
| 1Y Return | -6.96% | 7.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -11.82% | 12.70% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.44% | 24.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.70% | 15.78% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.10 | 0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.16 | 0.68 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.02 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.07 | 0.46 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.25 | 0.93 |
| Ulcer Index | 16.42% | 13.76% |
| Daily Std Dev | 42.48% | 49.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -85.98% | -86.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -56.09% | -27.66% |
Fundamentals
| BTG | GFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.70B | $12.55B |
| EPS | -$0.55 | $0.71 |
| PEG Ratio | 4.71 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.45B | $4.36B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $610.48M | $1.11B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $827.50M | $1.91B |
Correlation
The correlation between BTG and GFI is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BTG vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BTG achieves a -11.26% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, BTG has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 6.70%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BTG vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B2Gold Corp. (BTG) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BTG vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
BTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, more than GFI's 2.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTG B2Gold Corp. | 5.97% | 5.06% | 4.48% | 4.07% | 1.96% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 2.84% | 2.86% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.73% | 0.80% | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.69% | 0.72% | 0.86% | 2.66% |
Drawdowns
BTG vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTG drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -86.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTG and GFI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BTG vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for B2Gold Corp. (BTG) is 10.50%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 15.98%. This indicates that BTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BTG vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B2Gold Corp. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities