BTDR vs. CIFR
BTDR (Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares) and CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) are both stocks. BTDR operates in Software - Application (Technology), while CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, BTDR returned 59.58%/yr vs 116.66%/yr for CIFR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BTDR vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BTDR having a 75.83% return and CIFR slightly higher at 77.78%.
BTDR
- 1D
- 5.06%
- 1M
- 62.09%
- YTD
- 75.83%
- 6M
- 56.30%
- 1Y
- 52.67%
- 3Y*
- 59.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFR
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 46.67%
- YTD
- 77.78%
- 6M
- 40.85%
- 1Y
- 663.90%
- 3Y*
- 116.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTDR vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTDR Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares | 75.83% | -48.27% | 119.78% | -1.40% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 77.78% | 218.10% | 12.35% | 55.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTDR and CIFR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between BTDR and CIFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
BTDR:
$4.60B
CIFR:
$10.63B
BTDR:
-$2.23
CIFR:
-$2.33
BTDR:
6.03
CIFR:
57.66
BTDR:
6.30
CIFR:
14.88
BTDR:
$739.06M
CIFR:
$174.98M
BTDR:
$25.18M
CIFR:
-$172.84M
BTDR:
$59.65M
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTDR vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
BTDR
CIFR
BTDR vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTDR | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.49 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 13.04 | -12.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 26.19 | -24.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTDR | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 6.19 | -5.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.18 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
BTDR vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTDR drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTDR and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTDR | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.52% | -97.16% | +17.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.89% | -51.38% | -20.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.52% | -71.74% | -7.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.48% | -0.19% | -24.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.78% | -66.62% | +22.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.65% | 25.53% | +17.12% |
Volatility
BTDR vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) has a higher volatility of 34.35% compared to Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) at 31.03%. This indicates that BTDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTDR | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.35% | 31.03% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.55% | 70.59% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.00% | 108.31% | -8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 122.89% | 121.98% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.89% | 121.98% | +0.91% |
Dividends
BTDR vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTDR nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BTDR vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BTDR and CIFR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTDR has higher volatility (34.35%) compared to CIFR (31.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTDR dropped -79.52% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.19 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTDR and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer