PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCT vs. IWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCT vs. IWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCT achieves a -12.31% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 17.01% return.


BTCT

1D
-5.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-12.31%
6M
-33.72%
1Y
-62.50%
3Y*
-33.84%
5Y*
-71.38%
10Y*

IWD

1D
1.41%
1M
2.89%
YTD
17.01%
6M
15.79%
1Y
29.73%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCT vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BTCT
BTC Digital Ltd.
-12.31%-72.80%-0.83%37.40%-97.67%-87.48%-88.89%
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
17.01%15.68%14.17%11.34%-7.75%24.95%37.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCT and IWD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2020

0.21

The correlation between BTCT and IWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCT vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCT
BTCT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BTCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IWD
IWD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCT vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCTIWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.48

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

4.40

-5.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

18.23

-19.32

BTCT vs. IWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the IWD Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCT and IWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCT vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCT drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than IWD's maximum drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCT and IWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCTIWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-60.10%

-39.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.59%

-6.79%

-67.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.53%

-15.71%

-78.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.82%

-19.04%

-80.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

0.00%

-99.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.85%

-8.63%

-86.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.19%

1.63%

+55.56%

Volatility

BTCT vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison

BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) has a higher volatility of 26.56% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 4.25%. This indicates that BTCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCTIWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.56%

4.25%

+22.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.05%

8.74%

+46.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.25%

11.30%

+67.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

186.76%

14.85%

+171.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

173.99%

17.28%

+156.71%

Dividends

BTCT vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison

BTCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCT
BTC Digital Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.43%1.69%1.87%2.02%2.15%1.62%2.05%2.45%2.71%2.09%2.25%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCT and IWD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCT has higher volatility (26.56%) compared to IWD (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCT dropped -99.99% vs IWD's -60.10%.

IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCT and IWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer