BTCT vs. IWD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD).

IWD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.

Performance

BTCT vs. IWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BTCT vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BTCT BTC Digital Ltd.	-13.85%	-72.80%	-0.83%	37.40%	-97.67%	-87.48%	-91.45%
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF	1.97%	15.68%	14.17%	11.34%	-7.75%	24.95%	40.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCT achieves a -13.85% return, which is significantly lower than IWD's 1.97% return.

BTCT

• 1D: 3.70%
• 1M: -9.68%
• YTD: -13.85%
• 6M: -59.27%
• 1Y: -72.14%
• 3Y*: -36.48%
• 5Y*: -76.05%
• 10Y*: —

IWD

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -4.89%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 5.86%
• 1Y: 15.56%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BTCT vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCT

BTCT Risk / Return Rank: 6
BTCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BTCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BTCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BTCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BTCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

IWD

IWD Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
IWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
IWD Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IWD Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCT vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCT	IWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	0.99	-1.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.74	1.45	-3.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.22	-0.40
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	1.42	-2.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	6.68	-8.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCT vs. IWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the IWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCT and IWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCT	IWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	0.99	-1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.41	0.61	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.45	0.40	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between BTCT and IWD is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BTCT vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison

BTCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTCT BTC Digital Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF	1.67%	1.69%	1.87%	2.02%	2.15%	1.62%	2.05%	2.45%	2.71%	2.09%	2.25%	2.47%

Drawdowns

BTCT vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCT drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than IWD's maximum drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCT and IWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCT	IWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-60.10%	-39.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.71%	-11.80%	-62.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.93%	-19.04%	-80.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-4.89%	-95.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-94.71%	-8.71%	-86.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.55%	2.50%	+44.05%

Volatility

BTCT vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison

BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 4.33%. This indicates that BTCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCT	IWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.11%	4.33%	+10.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.43%	8.26%	+47.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.95%	15.76%	+64.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	187.16%	14.80%	+172.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	176.42%	17.28%	+159.14%