PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCT vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTCT vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCT achieves a -11.54% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.16% return.


BTCT

1D
-3.36%
1M
-6.50%
YTD
-11.54%
6M
-36.46%
1Y
-65.15%
3Y*
-33.78%
5Y*
-71.18%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.13%
1M
5.25%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCT vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BTCT
BTC Digital Ltd.
-11.54%-72.80%-0.83%37.40%-97.67%-87.48%-91.45%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
11.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%45.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCT and ^GSPC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2020

0.26

The correlation between BTCT and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCT vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCT
BTCT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BTCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCT vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCT^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.85

2.39

-3.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.44

3.25

-4.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.43

-0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

3.16

-4.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.21

14.61

-15.82

BTCT vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCT and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCT^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

2.39

-3.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

0.75

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.47

-0.92

Drawdowns

BTCT vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCT drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCT and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCT^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-56.78%

-43.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.59%

-9.10%

-65.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.53%

-18.90%

-75.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.82%

-25.43%

-74.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

0.00%

-99.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.85%

-10.72%

-84.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

54.39%

1.97%

+52.42%

Volatility

BTCT vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

BTC Digital Ltd. (BTCT) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.84%. This indicates that BTCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCT^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.15%

2.84%

+10.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.87%

8.98%

+42.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.82%

11.87%

+64.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

186.35%

16.90%

+169.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

174.20%

18.07%

+156.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCT and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCT has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to ^GSPC (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCT dropped -99.99% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCT and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer