PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCS vs. RIOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BTCS vs. RIOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BTCS Inc. (BTCS) and Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCS achieves a -59.47% return, which is significantly lower than RIOT's 126.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BTCS has underperformed RIOT with an annualized return of -40.52%, while RIOT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.91% annualized return.


BTCS

1D
-3.60%
1M
-35.15%
YTD
-59.47%
6M
-64.69%
1Y
-48.96%
3Y*
-4.70%
5Y*
-29.59%
10Y*
-40.52%

RIOT

1D
0.21%
1M
17.15%
YTD
126.44%
6M
109.88%
1Y
209.49%
3Y*
35.24%
5Y*
-3.35%
10Y*
24.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCS vs. RIOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTCS
BTCS Inc.
-59.47%8.08%51.53%158.73%-79.65%65.26%179.41%-85.38%-92.95%144.44%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
126.44%24.09%-34.00%356.34%-84.82%31.43%1,416.96%-25.83%-94.68%729.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCS and RIOT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2014

0.34

The correlation between BTCS and RIOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTCS:

$51.60M

RIOT:

$9.97B

EPS

BTCS:

-$1.97

RIOT:

-$2.35

PS Ratio

BTCS:

2.74

RIOT:

16.19

PB Ratio

BTCS:

0.74

RIOT:

4.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTCS:

$16.95M

RIOT:

$653.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTCS:

$2.90M

RIOT:

$179.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

BTCS:

-$65.04M

RIOT:

-$482.33M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCS vs. RIOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCS
BTCS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BTCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RIOT
RIOT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RIOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIOT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RIOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCS vs. RIOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTCS Inc. (BTCS) and Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCSRIOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.35

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

4.34

-4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.87

8.59

-9.46

BTCS vs. RIOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCS Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the RIOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCS and RIOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCS vs. RIOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RIOT drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCS and RIOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCSRIOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.98%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.53%

-48.57%

-34.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.53%

-69.00%

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.94%

-92.55%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.75%

-98.32%

-1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-99.10%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.68%

-87.85%

-9.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.26%

24.49%

+31.77%

Volatility

BTCS vs. RIOT - Volatility Comparison

BTCS Inc. (BTCS) has a higher volatility of 20.13% compared to Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) at 18.61%. This indicates that BTCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCSRIOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.13%

18.61%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.16%

60.82%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

147.90%

83.62%

+64.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

128.44%

93.65%

+34.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

193.35%

112.18%

+81.17%

Dividends

BTCS vs. RIOT - Dividend Comparison

BTCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while RIOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTCS
BTCS Inc.
4.67%1.89%0.00%0.00%7.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.52%

Financials

BTCS vs. RIOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BTCS Inc. and Riot Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
2.15M
167.22M
(BTCS) Total Revenue
(RIOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCS and RIOT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCS has higher volatility (20.13%) compared to RIOT (18.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCS dropped -100.00% vs RIOT's -99.98%.

RIOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCS and RIOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer