PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCO vs. MARA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTCO vs. MARA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTCO vs. MARA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
-22.16%-6.58%100.54%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
-10.47%-46.45%-25.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -22.16% return, which is significantly lower than MARA's -10.47% return.


BTCO

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
-22.16%
6M
-42.11%
1Y
-20.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MARA

1D
-1.47%
1M
-14.92%
YTD
-10.47%
6M
-56.80%
1Y
-32.09%
3Y*
-2.67%
5Y*
-30.29%
10Y*
-12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCO vs. MARA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCO
BTCO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BTCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MARA
MARA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCO vs. MARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCOMARADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

-0.40

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

-0.11

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.99

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

-0.43

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

-0.81

+0.06

BTCO vs. MARA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is comparable to the MARA Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCO and MARA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCOMARADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

-0.40

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

-0.11

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between BTCO and MARA is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BTCO vs. MARA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCO nor MARA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BTCO vs. MARA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum MARA drawdown of -99.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and MARA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCOMARADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-99.74%

+50.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.33%

-70.53%

+21.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.78%

-94.80%

+49.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-77.82%

+63.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.23%

37.17%

-13.94%

Volatility

BTCO vs. MARA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) is 13.03%, while Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a volatility of 23.86%. This indicates that BTCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MARA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTCOMARADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

23.86%

-10.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.73%

61.56%

-24.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.12%

81.56%

-36.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.78%

107.54%

-56.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.78%

144.03%

-93.25%