PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTCM vs. XLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BTCM and XLK is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

BTCM vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BIT Mining Limited (BTCM) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-98.81%
714.34%
BTCM
XLK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTCM:

-0.44

XLK:

0.84

Sortino Ratio

BTCM:

-0.20

XLK:

1.23

Omega Ratio

BTCM:

0.98

XLK:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

BTCM:

-0.41

XLK:

1.13

Martin Ratio

BTCM:

-1.02

XLK:

3.80

Ulcer Index

BTCM:

39.75%

XLK:

5.05%

Daily Std Dev

BTCM:

92.35%

XLK:

22.83%

Max Drawdown

BTCM:

-99.72%

XLK:

-82.05%

Current Drawdown

BTCM:

-99.53%

XLK:

-0.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCM achieves a -5.16% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BTCM has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of -34.93%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 20.35% annualized return.


BTCM

YTD

-5.16%

1M

-17.59%

6M

7.66%

1Y

-42.96%

5Y*

-48.58%

10Y*

-34.93%

XLK

YTD

3.20%

1M

2.50%

6M

8.76%

1Y

19.28%

5Y*

19.91%

10Y*

20.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTCM vs. XLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTCM is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTCM is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTCM is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTCM is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTCM is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTCM is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLK is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLK is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLK is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLK is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLK is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLK is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTCM vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BIT Mining Limited (BTCM) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTCM, currently valued at -0.44, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.440.84
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTCM, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.201.23
The chart of Omega ratio for BTCM, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.981.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTCM, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.411.13
The chart of Martin ratio for BTCM, currently valued at -1.02, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.023.80
BTCM
XLK

The current BTCM Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCM and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.44
0.84
BTCM
XLK

Dividends

BTCM vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

BTCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BTCM
BIT Mining Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.64%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%1.75%

Drawdowns

BTCM vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCM drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCM and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-99.53%
-0.77%
BTCM
XLK

Volatility

BTCM vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

BIT Mining Limited (BTCM) has a higher volatility of 13.30% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 7.49%. This indicates that BTCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
13.30%
7.49%
BTCM
XLK
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab