BTCI vs. GIAX
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while GIAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -41.43% vs 11.65% for GIAX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GIAX.
Performance
BTCI vs. GIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -24.61% return, which is significantly lower than GIAX's 7.71% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- 6M
- -29.88%
- YTD
- -24.61%
- 1Y
- -41.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX
- 1D
- -4.24%
- 1M
- -9.44%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 11.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI vs. GIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -24.61% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 7.71% | 11.73% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and GIAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between BTCI and GIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. GIAX — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
GIAX
BTCI vs. GIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCI | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.10 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.66 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 2.37 | -3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. GIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -48.42%, which is greater than GIAX's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and GIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.42% | -20.38% | -28.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.42% | -17.62% | -30.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.25% | -14.34% | -29.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.15% | -3.26% | -13.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.39% | 4.92% | +24.47% |
Volatility
BTCI vs. GIAX - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 9.70% compared to Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) at 8.21%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.70% | 8.21% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.60% | 21.95% | +9.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.91% | 24.32% | +15.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.04% | 22.31% | +17.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.04% | 22.31% | +17.73% |
BTCI vs. GIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GIAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. GIAX - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.61%, more than GIAX's 26.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 42.61% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 26.80% | 25.62% | 10.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCI and GIAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to GIAX (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -48.42% vs GIAX's -20.38%.
On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 11.65% vs -41.43% for BTCI. On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GIAX has been the lower-risk option at 8.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 11.65% return vs -41.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 42.61%, compared with 26.80% for GIAX.
BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GIAX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.97% for GIAX.
GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and GIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer