BTCI vs. GIAX
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while GIAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -40.76% vs 22.47% for GIAX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GIAX.
Performance
BTCI vs. GIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -29.86% return, which is significantly lower than GIAX's 16.24% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -20.99%
- YTD
- -29.86%
- 6M
- -29.65%
- 1Y
- -40.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 16.24%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI vs. GIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -29.86% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 16.24% | 11.73% | -0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and GIAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between BTCI and GIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. GIAX — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
GIAX
BTCI vs. GIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCI | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.19 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 1.28 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 5.17 | -6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. GIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -48.13%, which is greater than GIAX's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and GIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.13% | -20.38% | -27.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.13% | -17.62% | -30.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.13% | -7.56% | -40.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.20% | -3.08% | -13.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.33% | 4.35% | +22.98% |
Volatility
BTCI vs. GIAX - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) at 10.26%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 10.26% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.43% | 20.97% | +10.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.86% | 23.31% | +16.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.37% | 22.05% | +18.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.37% | 22.05% | +18.32% |
BTCI vs. GIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GIAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. GIAX - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.80%, more than GIAX's 25.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 45.80% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 25.22% | 25.62% | 10.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCI and GIAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to GIAX (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -48.13% vs GIAX's -20.38%.
On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 22.47% vs -40.76% for BTCI. On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GIAX has been the lower-risk option at 10.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 22.47% return vs -40.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 45.80%, compared with 25.22% for GIAX.
BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GIAX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.97% for GIAX.
GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and GIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer