BTBT vs. CLSK
BTBT (Bit Digital, Inc.) and CLSK (CleanSpark, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Capital Markets industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, BTBT returned -20.17%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for CLSK. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BTBT vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTBT achieves a 17.99% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's 72.43% return.
BTBT
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- 12.06%
- YTD
- 17.99%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- -4.29%
- 3Y*
- -19.97%
- 5Y*
- -20.17%
- 10Y*
- —
CLSK
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 72.43%
- 6M
- 44.21%
- 1Y
- 93.89%
- 3Y*
- 56.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- -6.03%
BTBT vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTBT Bit Digital, Inc. | 17.99% | -35.49% | -30.73% | 605.00% | -90.13% | -72.25% | 5,377.50% | -93.85% | 25.00% |
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 72.43% | 9.88% | -16.50% | 440.69% | -78.57% | -67.23% | 442.99% | -73.90% | 30.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTBT and CLSK is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, BTBT and CLSK have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BTBT:
-$498.30
CLSK:
-$2.24
BTBT:
0.02
CLSK:
5.27
BTBT:
$28.01B
CLSK:
$739.88M
BTBT:
$48.37M
CLSK:
$306.93M
BTBT:
-$162.09B
CLSK:
-$103.41M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTBT vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank
BTBT
CLSK
BTBT vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTBT | CLSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 1.46 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 2.41 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTBT vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTBT drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTBT and CLSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTBT | CLSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.16% | -98.56% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.02% | -64.74% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.08% | -71.28% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.92% | -92.00% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.38% | -76.10% | -16.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.66% | -69.77% | -5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.19% | 39.11% | +6.08% |
Volatility
BTBT vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) has a higher volatility of 25.18% compared to CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) at 20.59%. This indicates that BTBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTBT | CLSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.18% | 20.59% | +4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.64% | 60.37% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.18% | 88.55% | +4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.52% | 100.73% | +16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 133.74% | 183.32% | -49.58% |
Dividends
BTBT vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTBT nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BTBT vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bit Digital, Inc. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BTBT and CLSK have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTBT has higher volatility (25.18%) compared to CLSK (20.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTBT dropped -98.16% vs CLSK's -98.56%.
CLSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTBT and CLSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer