BTAL vs. AVUV
BTAL (AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTAL is a Long-Short fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. BTAL is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTAL returned -4.56%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for AVUV. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. BTAL charges 2.11%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
BTAL vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -19.67% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.96% return.
BTAL
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- -19.67%
- 6M
- -18.88%
- 1Y
- -37.06%
- 3Y*
- -12.64%
- 5Y*
- -4.56%
- 10Y*
- -4.73%
AVUV
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BTAL vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -19.67% | -20.17% | 12.83% | -15.11% | 20.48% | -6.81% | -13.86% | -5.71% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 17.96% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTAL and AVUV is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | -0.64 |
The correlation between BTAL and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.64 to -0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
BTAL vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BTAL
AVUV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
BTAL
AVUV
Financial Services
BTAL
AVUV
Industrials
BTAL
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
BTAL
AVUV
Healthcare
BTAL
AVUV
Real Estate
BTAL
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
BTAL
AVUV
Utilities
BTAL
AVUV
Energy
BTAL
AVUV
Basic Materials
BTAL
AVUV
Communication Services
BTAL
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTAL vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
BTAL
AVUV
BTAL vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTAL | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.36 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 4.61 | -5.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | 13.69 | -15.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTAL | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.72 | 2.10 | -3.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.47 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 0.56 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
BTAL vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, roughly equal to the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTAL | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.28% | -49.42% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.50% | -7.95% | -29.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.16% | -28.79% | -16.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.16% | -28.79% | -16.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.93% | -1.12% | -48.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -7.95% | -14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.54% | 2.67% | +18.87% |
Volatility
BTAL vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.08%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTAL | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 4.08% | +3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.38% | 11.34% | +4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 17.54% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 22.74% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 28.30% | -11.07% |
BTAL vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTAL vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than AVUV's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 3.10% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTAL and AVUV have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTAL has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to AVUV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -50.28% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.71% vs -4.56% for BTAL. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.71% return vs -4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.
BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 1.29% for AVUV.
BTAL is categorized as Long-Short, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: AGF and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 2.11% for BTAL and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTAL and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer