PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSY vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BSY vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSY achieves a -14.21% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 0.72% return.


BSY

1D
-4.06%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
-14.21%
6M
-23.05%
1Y
-31.08%
3Y*
-12.73%
5Y*
-11.55%
10Y*

LLY

1D
1.37%
1M
11.64%
YTD
0.72%
6M
4.73%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
41.13%
10Y*
32.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSY vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BSY
Bentley Systems, Incorporated
-14.21%-17.78%-10.07%41.78%-23.27%19.57%21.07%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.72%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BSY and LLY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.14

The correlation between BSY and LLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BSY:

$10.50B

LLY:

$966.48B

EPS

BSY:

$0.85

LLY:

$28.14

PE Ratio

BSY:

38.22

LLY:

38.33

PEG Ratio

BSY:

0.93

LLY:

0.77

PS Ratio

BSY:

6.93

LLY:

13.41

PB Ratio

BSY:

8.56

LLY:

30.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

BSY:

$1.56B

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BSY:

$1.27B

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

BSY:

$470.83M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSY vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSY
BSY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSY vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSYLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.24

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

1.90

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

4.73

-5.81

BSY vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSY Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSY and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSYLLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

1.19

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

1.26

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.57

-0.57

Drawdowns

BSY vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSY drawdown since its inception was -61.00%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSY and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSYLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.00%

-68.24%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.53%

-23.64%

-22.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.53%

-34.48%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.00%

-34.48%

-26.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.11%

-4.26%

-48.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-19.22%

-11.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.69%

9.49%

+19.20%

Volatility

BSY vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) has a higher volatility of 13.62% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.16%. This indicates that BSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSYLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.62%

9.16%

+4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.55%

26.81%

+3.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.27%

37.88%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.16%

32.79%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.51%

30.14%

+8.37%

Dividends

BSY vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

BSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than LLY's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSY
Bentley Systems, Incorporated
0.86%0.73%0.51%0.38%0.32%0.25%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.60%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Financials

BSY vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bentley Systems, Incorporated and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
424.18M
19.80B
(BSY) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BSY vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bentley Systems, Incorporated and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%20222023202420252026
82.6%
79.0%
Portfolio components
BSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bentley Systems, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 350.41M and revenue of 424.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.6%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

BSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bentley Systems, Incorporated reported an operating income of 126.26M and revenue of 424.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

BSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bentley Systems, Incorporated reported a net income of 95.39M and revenue of 424.18M, resulting in a net margin of 22.5%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BSY and LLY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSY has higher volatility (13.62%) compared to LLY (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSY dropped -61.00% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSY and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer