PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BSM vs. SILJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BSM and SILJ is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

BSM vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.99%
-9.19%
BSM
SILJ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BSM:

0.06

SILJ:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

BSM:

0.21

SILJ:

1.09

Omega Ratio

BSM:

1.02

SILJ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

BSM:

0.07

SILJ:

0.40

Martin Ratio

BSM:

0.21

SILJ:

1.84

Ulcer Index

BSM:

5.32%

SILJ:

12.93%

Daily Std Dev

BSM:

17.66%

SILJ:

39.87%

Max Drawdown

BSM:

-75.58%

SILJ:

-79.05%

Current Drawdown

BSM:

-7.41%

SILJ:

-42.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSM achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than SILJ's 4.13% return.


BSM

YTD

2.19%

1M

5.44%

6M

3.37%

1Y

-0.18%

5Y*

17.89%

10Y*

N/A

SILJ

YTD

4.13%

1M

2.49%

6M

-8.21%

1Y

20.95%

5Y*

0.55%

10Y*

3.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BSM vs. SILJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSM is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSM is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSM is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSM is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSM is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSM is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SILJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SILJ is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SILJ is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SILJ is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SILJ is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SILJ is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SILJ is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BSM vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BSM, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.060.60
The chart of Sortino ratio for BSM, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.211.09
The chart of Omega ratio for BSM, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.021.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for BSM, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.070.42
The chart of Martin ratio for BSM, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.000.211.84
BSM
SILJ

The current BSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSM and SILJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.06
0.60
BSM
SILJ

Dividends

BSM vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

BSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.72%, more than SILJ's 6.97% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
10.72%10.96%11.90%9.13%8.23%10.18%11.64%8.62%6.70%5.87%2.95%
SILJ
ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF
6.97%7.26%0.01%0.06%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.65%0.00%0.52%2.45%

Drawdowns

BSM vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSM drawdown since its inception was -75.58%, roughly equal to the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSM and SILJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.41%
-39.46%
BSM
SILJ

Volatility

BSM vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) is 5.31%, while ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that BSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.31%
10.14%
BSM
SILJ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab