BSM vs. SBR

In the year-to-date period, BSM achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than SBR's 5.84% return. Over the past 10 years, BSM has underperformed SBR with an annualized return of 6.77%, while SBR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.24% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BSM Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the SBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSM and SBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.00%, more than SBR's 7.82% yield.

The maximum BSM drawdown since its inception was -75.58%, which is greater than SBR's maximum drawdown of -56.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSM and SBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) at 5.55%. This indicates that BSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Stone Minerals, L.P. and Sabine Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.