BSM vs. KRP
Compare and contrast key facts about Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP).
Performance
BSM vs. KRP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSM vs. KRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSM Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 12.75% | 0.56% | 1.47% | 5.85% | 80.82% | 67.42% | -42.97% | -9.53% | -7.04% | 2.49% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 23.44% | -18.60% | 20.43% | 0.76% | 36.93% | 89.97% | -48.94% | 38.62% | -8.93% | -17.25% |
Fundamentals
BSM:
$3.12B
KRP:
$1.67B
BSM:
$1.38
KRP:
$0.47
BSM:
10.62
KRP:
30.23
BSM:
0.30
KRP:
0.11
BSM:
8.06
KRP:
5.08
BSM:
3.76
KRP:
3.14
BSM:
$395.04M
KRP:
$333.83M
BSM:
$296.51M
KRP:
$313.39M
BSM:
$323.06M
KRP:
$225.70M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSM achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than KRP's 23.44% return.
BSM
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 5.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
KRP
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 23.44%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 11.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSM vs. KRP — Risk / Return Rank
BSM
KRP
BSM vs. KRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSM | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 0.41 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 0.74 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.10 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 0.64 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 1.44 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSM | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.41 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.68 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.14 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSM and KRP is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BSM vs. KRP - Dividend Comparison
BSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, less than KRP's 11.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSM Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 8.68% | 10.16% | 10.96% | 11.90% | 9.13% | 8.23% | 10.18% | 11.64% | 8.61% | 6.69% | 5.86% | 2.94% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 11.10% | 13.61% | 10.78% | 11.50% | 11.26% | 8.36% | 11.00% | 9.29% | 12.22% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BSM vs. KRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSM drawdown since its inception was -75.58%, smaller than the maximum KRP drawdown of -80.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSM and KRP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSM | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.58% | -80.91% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.66% | -20.50% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.52% | -27.58% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -4.65% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.52% | -19.77% | +3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 9.19% | +0.57% |
Volatility
BSM vs. KRP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) is 5.71%, while Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that BSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSM | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 6.07% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.68% | 16.01% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.75% | 28.21% | -4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 28.54% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 41.32% | -9.64% |
Financials
BSM vs. KRP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Stone Minerals, L.P. and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities