BSM vs. AM
Compare and contrast key facts about Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Antero Midstream Corporation (AM).
Performance
BSM vs. AM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSM vs. AM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSM Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 16.05% | 0.56% | 1.47% | 5.85% | 80.82% | 67.42% | -42.97% | -9.53% | -7.04% | 2.49% |
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 29.72% | 24.37% | 28.46% | 25.73% | 21.98% | 39.55% | 27.59% | -60.29% | -22.28% | -2.32% |
Fundamentals
BSM:
$3.21B
AM:
$10.99B
BSM:
$1.38
AM:
$0.86
BSM:
10.93
AM:
26.61
BSM:
0.31
AM:
4.59
BSM:
8.30
AM:
8.73
BSM:
3.87
AM:
5.57
BSM:
$395.04M
AM:
$1.26B
BSM:
$296.51M
AM:
$822.21M
BSM:
$323.06M
AM:
$1.02B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSM achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than AM's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BSM has outperformed AM with an annualized return of 10.27%, while AM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.
BSM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
AM
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 20.19%
- 1Y
- 33.32%
- 3Y*
- 37.98%
- 5Y*
- 29.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSM vs. AM — Risk / Return Rank
BSM
AM
BSM vs. AM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Antero Midstream Corporation (AM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSM | AM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.43 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 1.90 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.27 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.42 | -1.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 5.81 | -4.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSM | AM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.43 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.09 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.23 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.15 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSM and AM is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BSM vs. AM - Dividend Comparison
BSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than AM's 3.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSM Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 8.43% | 10.16% | 10.96% | 11.90% | 9.13% | 8.23% | 10.18% | 11.64% | 8.61% | 6.69% | 5.86% | 2.94% |
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 3.95% | 5.06% | 5.96% | 7.18% | 8.34% | 10.15% | 15.95% | 18.28% | 7.53% | 4.27% | 3.14% | 2.93% |
Drawdowns
BSM vs. AM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSM drawdown since its inception was -75.58%, smaller than the maximum AM drawdown of -93.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSM and AM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSM | AM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.58% | -93.01% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.66% | -13.98% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.52% | -21.91% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.58% | -93.01% | +17.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -3.39% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.53% | -31.81% | +15.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 5.82% | +3.94% |
Volatility
BSM vs. AM - Volatility Comparison
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSM | AM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 5.42% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.40% | 13.98% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.57% | 23.44% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 26.97% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 42.17% | -10.49% |
Financials
BSM vs. AM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Stone Minerals, L.P. and Antero Midstream Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BSM vs. AM - Profitability Comparison
BSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported a gross profit of 65.41M and revenue of 95.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.
AM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported a gross profit of 209.19M and revenue of 314.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.5%.
BSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported an operating income of 51.33M and revenue of 95.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.9%.
AM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported an operating income of 187.18M and revenue of 314.67M, resulting in an operating margin of 59.5%.
BSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported a net income of 72.23M and revenue of 95.18M, resulting in a net margin of 75.9%.
AM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Antero Midstream Corporation reported a net income of 51.93M and revenue of 314.67M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.