BSM vs. AM
Compare and contrast key facts about Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Antero Midstream Corporation (AM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BSM or AM.
Key characteristics
| BSM | AM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.29% | 28.04% |
| 1Y Return | -3.14% | 25.24% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 21.38% | 21.52% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.67% | 37.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.12 | 1.38 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.04 | 2.06 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.00 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.13 | 2.46 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.26 | 6.57 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.18% | 4.16% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.00% | 19.81% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.58% | -89.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.99% | -3.59% |
Fundamentals
| BSM | AM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $7.42B |
| EPS | $1.62 | $0.80 |
| PE Ratio | 9.30 | 19.26 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.22 | 1.17 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $426.14M | $1.15B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $311.30M | $723.83M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $305.45M | $879.04M |
Correlation
The correlation between BSM and AM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BSM vs. AM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BSM achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than AM's 28.04% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BSM vs. AM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Antero Midstream Corporation (AM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BSM vs. AM - Dividend Comparison
BSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.56%, more than AM's 5.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSM Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 10.56% | 11.90% | 9.13% | 8.23% | 10.18% | 11.64% | 8.62% | 6.70% | 5.87% | 2.95% |
AM Antero Midstream Corporation | 5.98% | 7.18% | 8.34% | 10.15% | 15.98% | 14.27% | 4.04% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BSM vs. AM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSM drawdown since its inception was -75.58%, smaller than the maximum AM drawdown of -89.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSM and AM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BSM vs. AM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) is 3.92%, while Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that BSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BSM vs. AM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Stone Minerals, L.P. and Antero Midstream Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities