BSM vs. ABR

In the year-to-date period, BSM achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's -19.19% return. Over the past 10 years, BSM has underperformed ABR with an annualized return of 6.90%, while ABR has yielded a comparatively higher 15.40% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BSM Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the ABR Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSM and ABR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, less than ABR's 15.93% yield.

The maximum BSM drawdown since its inception was -75.58%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSM and ABR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) is 7.35%, while Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that BSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Black Stone Minerals, L.P. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.