BSJU vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
BSJU and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSJU is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2022. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both BSJU and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BSJU vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSJU vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJU Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.14% | 8.58% | 8.20% | 12.91% | -2.11% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.09% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -1.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJU achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.09% return.
BSJU
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSJU vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSJU vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
BSJU
BND
BSJU vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJU | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.93 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 1.32 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.75 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | 4.78 | +4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJU | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.93 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.59 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJU and BND is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BSJU vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
BSJU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than BND's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJU Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.62% | 6.52% | 7.08% | 6.74% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.93% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
BSJU vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJU drawdown since its inception was -7.51%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJU and BND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJU | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -18.58% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.14% | -2.44% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -2.54% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -3.07% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.90% | -0.13% |
Volatility
BSJU vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.63%. This indicates that BSJU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSJU | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 1.63% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 2.52% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.75% | 4.30% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.04% | 6.00% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.04% | 5.52% | +2.52% |