BSJS vs. LTPZ
BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while LTPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSJS returned 3.13%/yr vs -7.34%/yr for LTPZ. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BSJS charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LTPZ.
Performance
BSJS vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJS achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's -3.75% return.
BSJS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.71%
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- 6M
- -3.61%
- YTD
- -3.75%
- 1Y
- -2.50%
- 3Y*
- -1.54%
- 5Y*
- -7.34%
- 10Y*
- -0.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.78M | $4.52M | $3.44M | |
| $11.36M | $8.24M | $7.63M |
BSJS vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.27% | 8.31% | 7.38% | 12.28% | -13.69% | 3.40% | 3.92% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF | -3.75% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJS and LTPZ is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJS vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
BSJS
LTPZ
BSJS vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJS | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.98 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | -0.20 | +3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.84 | -0.42 | +16.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJS vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and LTPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJS | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -40.99% | +23.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.64% | -8.09% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.44% | -12.64% | +8.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -40.99% | +23.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -35.53% | +35.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -12.60% | +8.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 3.86% | -3.53% |
Volatility
BSJS vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is 0.59%, while PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that BSJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJS | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 2.05% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.10% | 6.79% | -4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73% | 9.03% | -6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.38% | 15.85% | -8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 15.03% | -7.98% |
BSJS vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJS vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, less than LTPZ's 6.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.16% | 6.49% | 7.04% | 6.75% | 5.82% | 4.86% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year U.S. TIPS Index ETF | 6.00% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJS and LTPZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTPZ has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to BSJS (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs LTPZ's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, BSJS leads with 3.13% vs -7.34% for LTPZ. On fees, LTPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSJS has performed better with a 3.13% return vs -7.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LTPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.
BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.16%, compared with 6.00% for LTPZ.
BSJS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while LTPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.20% for LTPZ.
BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJS and LTPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer