BSFC vs. ZOM

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BSFC having a -54.68% return and ZOM slightly higher at -54.17%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) and Zomedica Corp. (ZOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BSFC Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is comparable to the ZOM Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSFC and ZOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither BSFC nor ZOM has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BSFC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ZOM drawdown of -98.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSFC and ZOM.

Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) has a higher volatility of 56.42% compared to Zomedica Corp. (ZOM) at 24.88%. This indicates that BSFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Star Foods Corp. and Zomedica Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.