BSFC vs. LLY
BSFC (Blue Star Foods Corp.) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) are both stocks. BSFC operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while LLY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, BSFC returned -95.84%/yr vs 42.48%/yr for LLY. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BSFC vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSFC achieves a -58.45% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 5.64% return.
BSFC
- 1D
- -11.76%
- 1M
- 15.38%
- YTD
- -58.45%
- 6M
- -81.25%
- 1Y
- -98.75%
- 3Y*
- -97.86%
- 5Y*
- -95.84%
- 10Y*
- —
LLY
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 48.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.66%
- 5Y*
- 42.48%
- 10Y*
- 33.36%
BSFC vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSFC Blue Star Foods Corp. | -58.45% | -98.56% | -98.26% | -98.20% | -75.47% | -26.58% | 9.90% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 5.64% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 8.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSFC and LLY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
BSFC:
$68.72K
LLY:
$1.01T
BSFC:
-$0.09
LLY:
$28.14
BSFC:
0.01
LLY:
14.06
BSFC:
$2.89M
LLY:
$72.25B
BSFC:
$931.31K
LLY:
$59.75B
BSFC:
-$2.28M
LLY:
$32.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSFC vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
BSFC
LLY
BSFC vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSFC | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.25 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.07 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 5.16 | -6.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSFC | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 1.29 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.49 | 1.30 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | 0.58 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
BSFC vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSFC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSFC and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSFC | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -68.24% | -31.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.34% | -23.64% | -75.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -100.00% | -34.48% | -65.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -34.48% | -65.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | 0.00% | -100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.14% | -19.22% | -56.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 82.11% | 9.49% | +72.62% |
Volatility
BSFC vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) has a higher volatility of 75.85% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.72%. This indicates that BSFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSFC | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 75.85% | 9.72% | +66.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 185.25% | 27.08% | +158.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 294.31% | 38.06% | +256.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 196.73% | 32.83% | +163.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.53% | 30.17% | +162.36% |
Dividends
BSFC vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
BSFC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSFC Blue Star Foods Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.57% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
Financials
BSFC vs. LLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Star Foods Corp. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BSFC and LLY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSFC has higher volatility (75.85%) compared to LLY (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSFC dropped -100.00% vs LLY's -68.24%.
LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSFC and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer