BSFC vs. FAT

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

BSFC (Blue Star Foods Corp.) and FAT (FAT Brands Inc.) are both stocks. BSFC operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while FAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, BSFC returned -95.84%/yr vs -49.21%/yr for FAT. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BSFC vs. FAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSFC achieves a -58.45% return, which is significantly lower than FAT's -48.32% return.

BSFC

• 1D: -11.76%
• 1M: 15.38%
• YTD: -58.45%
• 6M: -81.25%
• 1Y: -98.75%
• 3Y*: -97.86%
• 5Y*: -95.84%
• 10Y*: —

FAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -48.32%
• 6M: -69.78%
• 1Y: -93.14%
• 3Y*: -63.95%
• 5Y*: -49.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSFC vs. FAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSFC Blue Star Foods Corp.	-58.45%	-98.56%	-98.26%	-98.20%	-75.47%	-26.58%	9.90%
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	-48.32%	-89.39%	-3.66%	32.64%	-50.03%	86.50%	84.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BSFC and FAT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020	0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap BSFC : $68.72K FAT : $2.91M
EPS BSFC : -$0.09 FAT : -$12.65
PS Ratio BSFC : 0.01 FAT : 0.01
Total Revenue (TTM) BSFC : $2.89M FAT : $574.14M
Gross Profit (TTM) BSFC : $931.31K FAT : $157.40M
EBITDA (TTM) BSFC : -$2.28M FAT : -$45.08M

Return for Risk

BSFC vs. FAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSFC

BSFC Risk / Return Rank: 18
BSFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BSFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BSFC Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BSFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BSFC Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FAT

FAT Risk / Return Rank: 3
FAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FAT Omega Ratio Rank: 0
FAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSFC vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSFC	FAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	-0.96	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.39	-2.65	+2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.54	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-0.99	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	-1.36	+0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSFC vs. FAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSFC Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is higher than the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSFC and FAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSFC	FAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	-0.96	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.49	-0.75	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	-0.41	-0.06

Drawdowns

BSFC vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSFC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FAT drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSFC and FAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSFC	FAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-97.48%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-99.34%	-94.21%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-100.00%	-96.59%	-3.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-100.00%	-97.48%	-2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-97.48%	-2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.14%	-49.89%	-26.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	82.11%	68.02%	+14.09%

Volatility

BSFC vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison

Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) has a higher volatility of 75.85% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 0.00%. This indicates that BSFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSFC	FAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	75.85%	0.00%	+75.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	185.25%	77.35%	+107.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	294.31%	97.46%	+196.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	196.73%	66.27%	+130.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	192.53%	77.23%	+115.30%

Dividends

BSFC vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSFC nor FAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BSFC Blue Star Foods Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	10.53%	9.24%	10.92%	4.91%	0.00%	2.64%	7.66%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSFC and FAT in my portfolio?

BSFC and FAT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSFC or FAT?

BSFC has higher volatility (75.85%) compared to FAT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSFC dropped -100.00% vs FAT's -97.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.