BSFC vs. FAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT).

Performance

BSFC vs. FAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BSFC vs. FAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSFC Blue Star Foods Corp.	-44.60%	-98.56%	-98.26%	-98.20%	-75.47%	-26.58%	9.90%
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	-48.32%	-89.39%	-3.66%	32.64%	-50.03%	86.50%	84.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BSFC : $18.09K FAT : $2.91M
EPS BSFC : -$0.61 FAT : -$12.65
PS Ratio BSFC : 0.01 FAT : 0.01
Total Revenue (TTM) BSFC : $1.27M FAT : $574.14M
Gross Profit (TTM) BSFC : -$978.55K FAT : $157.40M
EBITDA (TTM) BSFC : -$9.63M FAT : -$45.08M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSFC achieves a -44.60% return, which is significantly higher than FAT's -48.32% return.

BSFC

• 1D: 11.11%
• 1M: -28.57%
• YTD: -44.60%
• 6M: -94.92%
• 1Y: -98.00%
• 3Y*: -98.01%
• 5Y*: -94.64%
• 10Y*: —

FAT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -48.32%
• 6M: -91.66%
• 1Y: -94.35%
• 3Y*: -63.58%
• 5Y*: -45.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BSFC vs. FAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSFC

BSFC Risk / Return Rank: 17
BSFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BSFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BSFC Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BSFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BSFC Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FAT

FAT Risk / Return Rank: 3
FAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
FAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSFC vs. FAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) and FAT Brands Inc. (FAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSFC	FAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	-0.93	+0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	-2.74	+2.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.58	+0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	-1.00	+0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	-1.66	+0.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSFC vs. FAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSFC Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is higher than the FAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSFC and FAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSFC	FAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	-0.93	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.49	-0.68	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.49	-0.42	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between BSFC and FAT is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BSFC vs. FAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BSFC nor FAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BSFC Blue Star Foods Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FAT FAT Brands Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	10.53%	9.24%	10.92%	4.91%	0.00%	2.64%	7.66%

Drawdowns

BSFC vs. FAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSFC drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FAT drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSFC and FAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSFC	FAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-97.48%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.74%	-94.41%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-100.00%	-97.48%	-2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-97.48%	-2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.38%	-48.86%	-26.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.04%	56.94%	+14.10%

Volatility

BSFC vs. FAT - Volatility Comparison

Blue Star Foods Corp. (BSFC) has a higher volatility of 52.01% compared to FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) at 0.00%. This indicates that BSFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSFC	FAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	52.01%	0.00%	+52.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	211.16%	102.42%	+108.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	279.82%	101.59%	+178.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	192.43%	67.02%	+125.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	189.18%	78.07%	+111.11%

Financials