BSCO vs. IBDQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2024 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ).
BSCO and IBDQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BSCO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2024 TR Index. It was launched on Sep 17, 2014. IBDQ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. Both BSCO and IBDQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BSCO or IBDQ.
Key characteristics
| BSCO | IBDQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.73% | 1.14% |
| 1Y Return | 4.95% | 4.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.61% | -0.16% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.84% | 2.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 5.65 | 2.32 |
| Daily Std Dev | 0.89% | 1.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.44% | -15.19% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCO and IBDQ is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BSCO vs. IBDQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BSCO achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than IBDQ's 1.14% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCO vs. IBDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSCO and IBDQ have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BSCO vs. IBDQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2024 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BSCO vs. IBDQ - Dividend Comparison
BSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than IBDQ's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCO Invesco BulletShares 2024 Corporate Bond ETF | 2.99% | 2.87% | 2.15% | 2.01% | 2.43% | 3.02% | 3.21% | 3.01% | 3.16% | 3.34% | 0.78% |
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 3.50% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.06% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BSCO vs. IBDQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCO drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than IBDQ's maximum drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCO and IBDQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BSCO vs. IBDQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2024 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCO) is 0.19%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that BSCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.