PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRZU vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRZU achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 61.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BRZU has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -16.20%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.


BRZU

1D
1.06%
1M
-24.13%
YTD
12.94%
6M
0.45%
1Y
58.46%
3Y*
9.40%
5Y*
-3.84%
10Y*
-16.20%

TQQQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
26.46%
YTD
61.91%
6M
54.01%
1Y
132.34%
3Y*
68.49%
5Y*
27.97%
10Y*
44.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
12.94%97.99%-57.07%55.48%8.30%-39.23%-91.34%57.02%-37.21%30.80%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
61.91%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BRZU and TQQQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013

0.38

The correlation between BRZU and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (5 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BRZU
TQQQ

Financial Services

32.7%
0.2%

Energy

18.7%
0.6%

Basic Materials

13.7%
1.1%

Utilities

12.8%
1.4%

Industrials

10.9%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
7.7%

Healthcare

2.4%
4.2%

Communication Services

2.2%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
12.3%

Technology

0.9%
53.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Financial Services

BRZU
32.7%
TQQQ
0.2%

Energy

BRZU
18.7%
TQQQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

BRZU
13.7%
TQQQ
1.1%

Utilities

BRZU
12.8%
TQQQ
1.4%

Industrials

BRZU
10.9%
TQQQ
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

BRZU
4.2%
TQQQ
7.7%

Healthcare

BRZU
2.4%
TQQQ
4.2%

Communication Services

BRZU
2.2%
TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BRZU
1.5%
TQQQ
12.3%

Technology

BRZU
0.9%
TQQQ
53.8%

Real Estate

BRZU

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRZU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRZU
BRZU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BRZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BRZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRZU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRZUTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.60

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

11.77

-6.37

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRZU and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRZUTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.80

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.42

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.20

0.68

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

0.74

-1.09

Drawdowns

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRZU drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRZU and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRZUTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-81.66%

-18.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.39%

-36.97%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-58.04%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.00%

-81.66%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.11%

-81.66%

-16.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.19%

-2.29%

-96.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.56%

-18.52%

-71.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.84%

11.28%

-0.44%

Volatility

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares (BRZU) has a higher volatility of 15.17% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.35%. This indicates that BRZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRZUTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.17%

13.35%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.51%

36.04%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.55%

47.60%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.37%

66.50%

-11.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.13%

65.95%

+17.18%

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRZU has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BRZU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

BRZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than TQQQ's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRZU
Direxion Daily Brazil Bull 2X Shares
2.36%2.39%8.73%3.24%4.70%6.29%0.78%0.95%1.04%0.74%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.37%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRZU and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRZU has higher volatility (15.17%) compared to TQQQ (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRZU dropped -99.71% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs -16.20% for BRZU. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs -16.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BRZU.

BRZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.37% for TQQQ.

BRZU tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for BRZU and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRZU and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer