PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRY vs. EFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BRY vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Berry Corporation (BRY) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BRY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EFC

1D
-1.76%
1M
3.68%
YTD
3.50%
6M
3.72%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRY vs. EFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BRY
Berry Corporation
0.00%-17.92%-34.12%-0.36%9.71%135.52%-59.55%13.17%-35.25%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
3.50%26.13%8.68%18.16%-18.32%26.33%-10.16%32.43%0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BRY and EFC is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between BRY and EFC has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BRY:

$252.98M

EFC:

$1.63B

EPS

BRY:

-$1.17

EFC:

$1.95

PS Ratio

BRY:

0.37

EFC:

3.35

PB Ratio

BRY:

0.40

EFC:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRY:

$680.16M

EFC:

$417.93M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRY:

$211.07M

EFC:

$347.01M

EBITDA (TTM)

BRY:

$91.56M

EFC:

$270.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRY vs. EFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRY

EFC
EFC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRY vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berry Corporation (BRY) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BRY vs. EFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRYEFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

Drawdowns

BRY vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRYEFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

Volatility

BRY vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRYEFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.26%

Dividends

BRY vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

BRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than EFC's 11.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRY
Berry Corporation
1.84%3.68%18.16%13.80%16.75%2.38%3.26%5.09%2.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
11.68%11.49%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%

Financials

BRY vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Berry Corporation and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
155.81M
61.25M
(BRY) Total Revenue
(EFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BRY and EFC have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRY and EFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer