PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRY vs. EFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BRY vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Berry Corporation (BRY) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BRY

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EFC

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.45%
6M
9.77%
YTD
4.88%
1Y
17.68%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
9.28%
ALL TIME*
9.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.71M$15.05M$17.24M

BRY vs. EFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BRY
Berry Corporation
0.00%-17.92%-34.12%-0.36%9.71%135.52%-59.55%13.17%-34.05%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
4.88%26.13%8.68%18.16%-18.32%26.33%-10.16%32.43%0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BRY and EFC is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between BRY and EFC has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BRY:

$253.00M

EFC:

$1.42B

EPS

BRY:

-$1.17

EFC:

$1.89

PS Ratio

BRY:

0.37

EFC:

3.42

PB Ratio

BRY:

0.40

EFC:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRY:

$680.16M

EFC:

$417.93M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRY:

$211.07M

EFC:

$347.01M

EBITDA (TTM)

BRY:

$91.56M

EFC:

$270.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRY vs. EFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BRY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EFC
EFC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BRY vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berry Corporation (BRY) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRYEFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.29

BRY vs. EFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRY vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRYEFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

Volatility

BRY vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRYEFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.28%

Dividends

BRY vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

BRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than EFC's 11.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRY
Berry Corporation
1.84%3.68%18.16%13.80%16.75%2.38%3.26%5.09%2.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
11.75%11.49%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%

Financials

BRY vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Berry Corporation and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BRY and EFC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRY and EFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer