BRPIX vs. AMAT
BRPIX (ProFunds Bear Fund) is Inverse Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BRPIX returned -14.06%/yr vs 37.62%/yr for AMAT. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BRPIX vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRPIX achieves a -8.33% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 124.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BRPIX has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of -14.06%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 37.62% annualized return.
BRPIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -6.70%
- YTD
- -8.33%
- 1Y
- -14.45%
- 3Y*
- -15.07%
- 5Y*
- -10.61%
- 10Y*
- -14.06%
AMAT
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 87.74%
- YTD
- 124.45%
- 1Y
- 192.84%
- 3Y*
- 60.46%
- 5Y*
- 34.64%
- 10Y*
- 37.62%
BRPIX vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRPIX ProFunds Bear Fund | -8.33% | -12.27% | -20.40% | -15.39% | 17.31% | -24.68% | -25.63% | -23.18% | 4.03% | -18.03% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 124.45% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRPIX and AMAT is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1997 | -0.61 |
The correlation between BRPIX and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (5 years) to -0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRPIX vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
BRPIX
AMAT
BRPIX vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Bear Fund (BRPIX) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRPIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.47 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 8.33 | -9.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | 23.59 | -25.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRPIX vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRPIX drawdown since its inception was -96.76%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRPIX and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRPIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.76% | -85.22% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.15% | -23.31% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.49% | -49.88% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.06% | -55.14% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.55% | -55.14% | -23.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.35% | -20.42% | -75.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.24% | -38.73% | -23.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.55% | 8.21% | +0.34% |
Volatility
BRPIX vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Bear Fund (BRPIX) is 4.22%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 29.63%. This indicates that BRPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRPIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 29.63% | -25.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 45.92% | -35.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 55.59% | -43.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 45.73% | -28.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 43.72% | -25.86% |
Dividends
BRPIX vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
BRPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than AMAT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.33% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
BRPIX ProFunds Bear Fund | 4.74% | 4.35% | 0.00% | 5.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRPIX and AMAT have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMAT has higher volatility (29.63%) compared to BRPIX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRPIX dropped -96.76% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRPIX and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer