BRO vs. MMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BRO or MMC.
Correlation
The correlation between BRO and MMC is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BRO vs. MMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BRO:
2.43
MMC:
0.87
BRO:
3.39
MMC:
1.21
BRO:
1.43
MMC:
1.16
BRO:
3.78
MMC:
1.15
BRO:
11.30
MMC:
3.39
BRO:
3.80%
MMC:
3.59%
BRO:
17.65%
MMC:
14.06%
BRO:
-54.08%
MMC:
-67.46%
BRO:
-6.59%
MMC:
-7.27%
Fundamentals
BRO:
$30.30B
MMC:
$104.79B
BRO:
$3.67
MMC:
$8.08
BRO:
28.87
MMC:
26.31
BRO:
4.41
MMC:
2.26
BRO:
$3.62B
MMC:
$18.39B
BRO:
$2.74B
MMC:
$8.03B
BRO:
$1.28B
MMC:
$5.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRO achieves a 3.85% return, which is significantly higher than MMC's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BRO has outperformed MMC with an annualized return of 22.10%, while MMC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.37% annualized return.
BRO
3.85%
2.68%
13.95%
43.12%
21.60%
22.10%
MMC
1.83%
1.46%
0.22%
11.77%
15.41%
16.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BRO vs. MMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BRO
MMC
BRO vs. MMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BRO vs. MMC - Dividend Comparison
BRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than MMC's 1.41% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. | 0.51% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.74% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.41% | 1.25% |
MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 1.41% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
BRO vs. MMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRO drawdown since its inception was -54.08%, smaller than the maximum MMC drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRO and MMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BRO vs. MMC - Volatility Comparison
Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) at 3.90%. This indicates that BRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BRO vs. MMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brown & Brown, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities