PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRHYX vs. CLOZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BRHYX vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock High Yield K (BRHYX) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BRHYX vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BRHYX
BlackRock High Yield K
-0.73%9.44%8.65%9.31%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
-1.54%5.99%11.85%14.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRHYX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's -1.54% return.


BRHYX

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
0.93%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
8.75%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
6.12%

CLOZ

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.03%
YTD
-1.54%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BRHYX vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRHYX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BRHYX vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRHYX
BRHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BRHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BRHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRHYX vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock High Yield K (BRHYX) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRHYXCLOZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

0.83

+1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

1.10

+1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.23

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.17

+1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.88

3.65

+7.23

BRHYX vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRHYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRHYX and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRHYXCLOZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.83

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

2.54

-1.32

Correlation

The correlation between BRHYX and CLOZ is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BRHYX vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

BRHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than CLOZ's 7.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRHYX
BlackRock High Yield K
6.68%7.14%7.56%6.20%4.98%4.80%5.22%5.82%6.48%5.92%6.03%6.42%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
7.82%7.63%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BRHYX vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRHYX drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRHYX and CLOZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BRHYXCLOZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.77%

-5.32%

-29.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.40%

-3.90%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-2.77%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-0.37%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

1.24%

-0.53%

Volatility

BRHYX vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock High Yield K (BRHYX) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 1.38%. This indicates that BRHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BRHYXCLOZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

1.38%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.43%

2.94%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

5.50%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

3.82%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.93%

3.82%

+2.11%