BRF vs. ESPO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO).
BRF and ESPO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BRF is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2009. ESPO is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. It was launched on Oct 16, 2018. Both BRF and ESPO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BRF or ESPO.
Correlation
The correlation between BRF and ESPO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BRF vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BRF:
-1.12
ESPO:
2.34
BRF:
-1.54
ESPO:
3.19
BRF:
0.81
ESPO:
1.39
BRF:
-0.45
ESPO:
1.80
BRF:
-1.77
ESPO:
14.58
BRF:
17.41%
ESPO:
3.55%
BRF:
27.56%
ESPO:
22.10%
BRF:
-81.72%
ESPO:
-50.99%
BRF:
-66.29%
ESPO:
-5.18%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRF achieves a -32.75% return, which is significantly lower than ESPO's 49.09% return.
BRF
-32.75%
-13.08%
-12.89%
-31.93%
-12.29%
-2.10%
ESPO
49.09%
2.73%
28.56%
49.07%
18.78%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BRF vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BRF vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BRF vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BRF nor ESPO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRF VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 5.01% | 4.13% | 2.97% | 1.66% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 4.53% | 4.25% | 3.84% | 4.23% | 1.85% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 0.00% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.37% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BRF vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRF drawdown since its inception was -81.72%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRF and ESPO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BRF vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 7.76%. This indicates that BRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.