BRDCY vs. GT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BRDCY (Bridgestone Corporation) and GT (The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Parts industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, BRDCY returned 3.53%/yr vs -13.51%/yr for GT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BRDCY vs. GT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRDCY achieves a -3.79% return, which is significantly higher than GT's -33.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BRDCY has outperformed GT with an annualized return of 3.53%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -13.51% annualized return.

BRDCY

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 5.27%
• YTD: -3.79%
• 6M: -8.76%
• 1Y: 6.33%
• 3Y*: 3.67%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 3.53%

GT

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -15.45%
• YTD: -33.79%
• 6M: -33.87%
• 1Y: -48.72%
• 3Y*: -24.43%
• 5Y*: -22.29%
• 10Y*: -13.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRDCY vs. GT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRDCY Bridgestone Corporation	-3.79%	36.08%	-16.65%	18.44%	-17.81%	30.79%	-11.30%	-3.65%	-17.43%	28.75%
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company	-33.79%	-2.67%	-37.15%	41.08%	-52.39%	95.42%	-29.02%	-20.89%	-35.38%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BRDCY and GT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.35

Fundamentals

EPS BRDCY : $132.61 GT : -$9.60
PS Ratio BRDCY : 0.01 GT : 0.07
Total Revenue (TTM) BRDCY : $4.55T GT : $17.91B
Gross Profit (TTM) BRDCY : $1.76T GT : $2.63B
EBITDA (TTM) BRDCY : $825.40B GT : $832.00M

Return for Risk

BRDCY vs. GT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRDCY

BRDCY Risk / Return Rank: 47
BRDCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BRDCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BRDCY Omega Ratio Rank: 42
BRDCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BRDCY Martin Ratio Rank: 49

GT

GT Risk / Return Rank: 5
GT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
GT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GT Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRDCY vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRDCY	GT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	-1.05	+1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	-1.58	+2.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.80	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	-0.92	+1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.70	-1.50	+2.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRDCY vs. GT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRDCY Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the GT Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRDCY and GT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRDCY	GT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	-1.05	+1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	-0.44	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	-0.28	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	-0.02	+0.17

Drawdowns

BRDCY vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRDCY drawdown since its inception was -45.83%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRDCY and GT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRDCY	GT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.83%	-94.50%	+48.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.16%	-53.27%	+33.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.47%	-65.34%	+39.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.15%	-76.88%	+42.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.83%	-86.55%	+40.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.10%	-89.79%	+75.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.51%	-48.70%	+31.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.02%	32.43%	-23.41%

Volatility

BRDCY vs. GT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) is 6.11%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 14.86%. This indicates that BRDCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRDCY	GT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	14.86%	-8.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.11%	32.48%	-14.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.37%	46.64%	-23.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.80%	51.03%	-28.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.95%	48.79%	-25.84%

Dividends

BRDCY vs. GT - Dividend Comparison

BRDCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRDCY Bridgestone Corporation	1.79%	1.72%	2.07%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.62%	0.00%
GT The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.47%	4.11%	2.84%	1.36%	1.00%	0.77%

Financials

BRDCY vs. GT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bridgestone Corporation and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BRDCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bridgestone Corporation reported a gross profit of 440.73B and revenue of 1.13T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

GT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BRDCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bridgestone Corporation reported an operating income of 124.62B and revenue of 1.13T, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

GT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BRDCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bridgestone Corporation reported a net income of 93.80B and revenue of 1.13T, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

GT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 3.88B, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BRDCY and GT in my portfolio?

BRDCY and GT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BRDCY or GT?

GT has higher volatility (14.86%) compared to BRDCY (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRDCY dropped -45.83% vs GT's -94.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRDCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.