PortfoliosLab logo
BRDCY vs. GT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BRDCY and GT is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BRDCY vs. GT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BRDCY:

-0.26

GT:

-0.27

Sortino Ratio

BRDCY:

-0.28

GT:

-0.02

Omega Ratio

BRDCY:

0.97

GT:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

BRDCY:

-0.28

GT:

-0.16

Martin Ratio

BRDCY:

-0.48

GT:

-0.50

Ulcer Index

BRDCY:

15.32%

GT:

28.07%

Daily Std Dev

BRDCY:

24.12%

GT:

54.43%

Max Drawdown

BRDCY:

-85.88%

GT:

-94.50%

Current Drawdown

BRDCY:

-9.03%

GT:

-80.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BRDCY:

$28.29B

GT:

$3.23B

EPS

BRDCY:

$1.43

GT:

$0.84

PE Ratio

BRDCY:

14.59

GT:

13.44

PEG Ratio

BRDCY:

0.00

GT:

1.67

PS Ratio

BRDCY:

0.01

GT:

0.17

PB Ratio

BRDCY:

1.11

GT:

0.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

BRDCY:

$1.11T

GT:

$18.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BRDCY:

$428.34B

GT:

$3.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

BRDCY:

$253.88B

GT:

$1.86B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRDCY achieves a 21.87% return, which is significantly lower than GT's 23.78% return. Over the past 10 years, BRDCY has outperformed GT with an annualized return of 3.64%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -8.80% annualized return.


BRDCY

YTD

21.87%

1M

4.34%

6M

18.62%

1Y

-6.15%

5Y*

9.59%

10Y*

3.64%

GT

YTD

23.78%

1M

17.88%

6M

17.39%

1Y

-14.77%

5Y*

11.84%

10Y*

-8.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BRDCY vs. GT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRDCY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BRDCY is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BRDCY is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BRDCY is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BRDCY is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BRDCY is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BRDCY is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GT is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GT is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GT is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GT is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GT is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GT is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BRDCY vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BRDCY Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is comparable to the GT Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRDCY and GT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BRDCY vs. GT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BRDCY nor GT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BRDCY
Bridgestone Corporation
0.00%0.00%3.27%3.65%3.42%3.10%3.98%3.76%3.00%3.62%4.73%2.53%
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.47%4.11%2.84%1.36%1.00%0.95%0.77%

Drawdowns

BRDCY vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRDCY drawdown since its inception was -85.88%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRDCY and GT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BRDCY vs. GT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) is 7.06%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that BRDCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BRDCY vs. GT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bridgestone Corporation and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20212022202320242025
1.11T
4.25B
(BRDCY) Total Revenue
(GT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items