PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BRDCY vs. GT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BRDCYGT
YTD Return6.03%-8.73%
1Y Return4.96%-12.34%
3Y Return (Ann)0.76%-13.20%
5Y Return (Ann)4.47%-3.43%
10Y Return (Ann)5.28%-5.13%
Sharpe Ratio0.32-0.27
Daily Std Dev18.26%40.20%
Max Drawdown-85.97%-94.50%
Current Drawdown-10.88%-76.99%

Fundamentals


BRDCYGT
Market Cap$30.33B$3.69B
EPS$1.53-$2.27
PE Ratio14.4333.33
PEG Ratio0.001.67
Revenue (TTM)$4.31T$19.66B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.59T$3.88B
EBITDA (TTM)$793.24B$1.58B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between BRDCY and GT is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BRDCY vs. GT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BRDCY achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly higher than GT's -8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BRDCY has outperformed GT with an annualized return of 5.28%, while GT has yielded a comparatively lower -5.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
83.94%
-48.13%
BRDCY
GT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bridgestone Corporation

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BRDCY vs. GT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRDCY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BRDCY, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BRDCY, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BRDCY, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BRDCY, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BRDCY, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.97
GT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GT, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GT, currently valued at -0.60, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.60

BRDCY vs. GT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRDCY Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the GT Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BRDCY and GT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.200.000.200.400.600.801.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.32
-0.27
BRDCY
GT

Dividends

BRDCY vs. GT - Dividend Comparison

BRDCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, while GT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BRDCY
Bridgestone Corporation
3.09%3.27%3.65%3.42%3.10%3.98%3.76%3.00%3.62%4.73%2.53%1.47%
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.47%4.11%2.84%1.36%1.00%0.95%0.77%0.21%

Drawdowns

BRDCY vs. GT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRDCY drawdown since its inception was -85.97%, smaller than the maximum GT drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRDCY and GT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-10.88%
-61.53%
BRDCY
GT

Volatility

BRDCY vs. GT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridgestone Corporation (BRDCY) is 4.22%, while The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that BRDCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.22%
7.01%
BRDCY
GT

Financials

BRDCY vs. GT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bridgestone Corporation and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items